Politická ekonomie 2025, 74(5)  | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.1524

Fed versus ECB: Which Matters Most for Visegrad Economies? Evidence from a Bayesian VAR Model

Monika Junicke, Vincenzo Merella
Monika Junicke (corresponding author), International Research Centre, Prague University of Economics and Business, Prague, Czechia
Vincenzo Merella, International Research Centre, Prague University of Economics and Business, Prague, Czechia; Department of Economics and Business Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy

This paper employs a VAR model with economically meaningful structural restrictions to examine how monetary policy shocks originating from the Fed and the ECB influence macroeconomic variables in Central European economies, specifically the Visegrad Group (V4). We investigate whether US monetary policy shocks affect the V4 independently or primarily through Germany. Our results indicate that US monetary policy shocks significantly affect V4 macroeconomic variables, at times equalling or surpassing the influence exerted by their European counterparts, even after accounting for indirect effects transmitted through Germany. Additionally, our findings highlight the dominance of the income absorption effect, leading to output contractions in these small open economies.

Keywords: Monetary policy, Federal Reserve System, European Central Bank, Visegrad Group, structural restrictions, monetary policy shocks
JEL classification: E52, F41, P24

Received: May 29, 2025; Revised: July 28, 2025; Accepted: August 4, 2025; Prepublished online: January 21, 2026; Published: October 23, 2026  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Junicke, M., & Merella, V. (2026). Fed versus ECB: Which Matters Most for Visegrad Economies? Evidence from a Bayesian VAR Model. Politická ekonomie, 74(5), 971-998. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.1524
Download citation

References

  1. Anzuini, A., Levy, A. (2007). Monetary policy shocks in the new EU members: a VAR approach. Applied Economics, 39(9), 1147-1161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840600592866 Go to original source...
  2. Banbura, M., Giannone, D., Reichlin, L. (2010). Large Bayesian vector auto regressions. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 25(1), 71-92. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.1137 Go to original source...
  3. Baumeister, C., Hamilton, J. D. (2015). Sign restrictions, structural vector autoregressions, and useful prior information. Econometrica, 83(5), 1963-1999. https://doi.org/10.3982/ECTA12356 Go to original source...
  4. Betts, C., Devereux, M. (1999). The international effects of monetary and fiscal policy in a two-country model. University of British Columbia Discussion Paper.
  5. Canova, F. (2005). The transmission of US shocks to Latin America. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 20(2), 229-251. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.837 Go to original source...
  6. Canova, F., Gambetti, L. (2003). Structural changes in the US economy: Is there a role for monetary policy? Universitat Pompeu Fabra Economics Working Papers No. 918.
  7. Carriero, A., Clark, T. E., Marcellino, M. (2015). Bayesian VARs: Specification choices and forecast accuracy. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 30(1), 46-73. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.2315 Go to original source...
  8. Cuestas, J. C., Filipozzi, F., Staehr, K. (2017). Uncovered interest parity in Central and Eastern Europe: Expectations and structural breaks. Review of International Economics, 25(5), 924-944. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12280 Go to original source...
  9. Cushman, D. O., Zha, T. (1995). Identifying monetary policy in a small open economy under flexible exchange rates. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Working Paper 95-7.
  10. Czech, K., Pietrych, £. (2021). The efficiency of the Polish zloty exchange rate market: The uncovered interest parity and fractal analysis approaches. Risks, 9(8), 142. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9080142 Go to original source...
  11. Dħbrowski, M. A., Janus, J. (2024). Does the interest parity puzzle hold for Central and Eastern European economies? Open Economies Review, 35(2), 421-456. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-023-09738-1 Go to original source...
  12. Fry, R., Pagan, A. (2011). Sign restrictions in structural vector autoregressions: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 49(4), 938-960. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.49.4.938 Go to original source...
  13. Gopinath, G. (2020). The Great Lockdown: Worst economic downturn since the Great Depression. [Retrieved 2025-05-29] Available at: https://www.imf.org/en/blogs/articles/2020/04/14/blog-weo-the-great-lockdown-worst-economic-downturn-since-the-great-depression
  14. Guerrieri, V., Lorenzoni, G., Straub, L., et al. (2022). Macroeconomic implications of COVID-19: Can negative supply shocks cause demand shortages? American Economic Review, 112(5), 1437-1474. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20201063 Go to original source...
  15. Han, S. (2024). US monetary policy, emerging market FDI firms and trade credit. Open Journal of Business and Management, 12(1), 667-696. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2024.121037 Go to original source...
  16. Ilzetzki, E., Jin, K. (2021). The puzzling change in the international transmission of US macroeconomic policy shocks. Journal of International Economics, 130, 103444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2021.103444 Go to original source...
  17. Jarociñski, M., Karadi, P. (2020). Deconstructing monetary policy surprises - the role of information shocks. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 12(2), 1-43. https://doi.org/10.1257/mac.20180090 Go to original source...
  18. Jiang, C., Li, X.-L., Chang, H.-L., et al. (2013). Uncovered interest parity and risk premium convergence in Central and Eastern European countries. Economic Modelling, 33, 204-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.04.025 Go to original source...
  19. Junicke, M. (2019). Trend inflation and monetary policy in Eastern Europe. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 23(4), 1649-1663. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1365100517000372 Go to original source...
  20. Kadiyala, K. R., Karlsson, S. (1997). Numerical methods for estimation and inference in Bayesian VAR-models. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 12(2), 99-132. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199703)12:2%3C99::AID-JAE429%3E3.0.CO;2-A Go to original source...
  21. Kilian, L., Lütkepohl, H. (2017). Structural Vector Autoregressive Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9781108164818. Go to original source...
  22. Kim, S. (1999). Do monetary policy shocks matter in the G-7 countries? Using common identifying assumptions about monetary policy across countries. Journal of International Economics, 48(2), 387-412. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(98)00052-X Go to original source...
  23. Kim, S. (2001a). Effects of monetary policy shocks on the trade balance in small open European countries. Economics Letters, 71(2), 197-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-1765(01)00364-0 Go to original source...
  24. Kim, S. (2001b). International transmission of U.S. monetary policy shocks: Evidence from VAR's. Journal of Monetary Economics, 48(2), 339-372. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(01)00080-0 Go to original source...
  25. Kim, S., Roubini, N. (2000). Exchange rate anomalies in the industrial countries: A solution with a structural VAR approach. Journal of Monetary Economics, 45(3), 561-586. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3932(00)00010-6 Go to original source...
  26. Maĉkowiak, B. (2006). How much of the macroeconomic variation in Eastern Europe is attributable to external shocks? Comparative Economic Studies, 48(3), 523-544. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ces.8100143 Go to original source...
  27. Maĉkowiak, B. (2007). External shocks, U.S. monetary policy and macroeconomic fluctuations in emerging markets. Journal of Monetary Economics, 54(8), 2512-2520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2007.06.021 Go to original source...
  28. Rubio-Ramirez, J. F., Waggoner, D. F., Zha, T. (2010). Structural vector autoregressions: Theory of identification and algorithms for inference. The Review of Economic Studies, 77(2), 665-696. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2009.00578.x Go to original source...
  29. Scholl, A., Uhlig, H. (2005). New evidence on puzzles. Results from agnostic identification on monetary policy and exchange rates. SFB 649 Discussion Papers No. 2005-037.
  30. Uhlig, H. (2005). What are the effects of monetary policy on output? Results from an agnostic identification procedure. Journal of Monetary Economics, 52(2), 381-419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2004.05.007 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.