Politická ekonomie 2021, 69(1):48-72 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.1307

Dlouhodobá udržitelnost penzijních systémů zemí Evropské unie

Lenka Lakotová ORCID...a
a Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, Národohospodářská fakulta, Praha, Česká republika

Long-term Sustainability of Pension Systems of European Union Countries

The article analyses the relationship between population ageing and sustainability of the EU countries' pension systems, and assesses how this relationship is affected by pension system design and parameters. The findings show that there is a link between population ageing and unsustainability of pension systems; however, there are exceptions in both directions. Despite the significant problem of population ageing, pension systems of some countries are found to be sustainable and vice versa. The elements enhancing sustainability are, for example, hypothetical defined contribution accounts or linking the pension benefit or retirement age to demographic changes. The article also analyses the relative significance of population ageing determinants. Life expectancy appears to be the most significant determinant of population ageing.

Keywords: pension system, sustainability of public finance, population ageing
JEL classification: H55, H68, J11

Received: November 13, 2019; Revised: November 24, 2020; Accepted: November 30, 2020; Published: March 5, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Lakotová, L. (2021). Long-term Sustainability of Pension Systems of European Union Countries. Politická ekonomie69(1), 48-72. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.1307
Download citation

References

  1. Aaron, H. (1966). The Social Insurance Paradox. Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science/Revue canadienne de economiques et science politique, 32(3), 371-374, https://doi.org/10.2307/139995 Go to original source...
  2. Afonso, A. (2005). Fiscal Sustainability: The Unpleasant European Case. FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, 61(1), 19-44, https://doi.org/10.1628/0015221053722532 Go to original source...
  3. Alonso-García, J., Boado-Penas, M. D. C., Devolder, P. (2018). Adequacy, Fairness and Sustainability of Pay-as-You-Go-Pension-Systems: Defined Benefit versus Defined Contribution. The European Journal of Finance, 24(13), 1100-1122, https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847x.2017.1399429 Go to original source...
  4. Barr, N. (2006). Pensions: Overview of the Issues. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22(1), 1-14, https://doi.org/10.1093/oxrep/grj001 Go to original source...
  5. Barr, N., Diamond, P. (2009). Reforming Pensions: Principles, Analytical Errors and Policy Directions. International Social Security Review, 62(2), 5-29, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-246X.2009.01327.x Go to original source...
  6. Cipriani, G. P. (2014). Population Aging and PAYG Pensions in the OLG Model. Journal of Population Economics, 27(1), 251-256, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-013-0465-9 Go to original source...
  7. Clements, B., Dybczak, K., Gaspar, V., et al. (2018). The Fiscal Consequences of Shrinking and Ageing Populations. Ageing International, 43(4), 391-414, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-017-9306-6 Go to original source...
  8. Disney, R. (1999). Notional Accounts as a Pension Reform Strategy: An Evaluation. The World Bank. Social Protection Discussion Papers and Notes No. 21302.
  9. Eckefeldt, P., Schwierz, C., Giamboni, L., et al. (2014). Identifying Fiscal Sustainability Challenges in the Areas of Pension, Health Care and Long-term Care Policies-European Commission. European Economy. Brussels Occacional Papers No. 201.
  10. European Commission (2018a). The 2018 Pension Adequacy Report. Current and Future Income Adequacy in Old Age in the EU. Volume II, Country profiles. Brussels: European Commission. pp. 288. ISBN 978-92-79-85660-0, https://doi.org/10.2767/406275 Go to original source...
  11. European Commission (2018b). Fiscal Sustainability Report 2018. Institutional Paper No. 094. Brussels: European Commission. pp. 212. (vol. 1). ISBN 978-92-79-98830-1, https://doi.org/10.2765/435292 Go to original source...
  12. European Commission (2018c). Fiscal Sustainability Report 2018. Institutional Paper No. 094. Brussels: European Commission. pp. 176. (vol. 2). ISBN 978-92-79-98871-4, https://doi.org/10.2765/014340 Go to original source...
  13. European Commission (2018d). The 2018 Ageing Report: Economic and Budgetary Projections for the EU Member States (2016-2070). Institutional Paper No. 079. Brussels: European Commission. pp. 406. ISBN 978-92-79-77460-7, https://doi.org/10.2765/615631 Go to original source...
  14. Eurostat (2019a). Population and Social Conditions. Population Projections. Population Projections at National Level (2015-2080). Demographic balances and indicators by type of projection [proj_19ndbi]. Old dependency ratio 1st variant (population 65 and over to population 15 to64 years). Baseline Projections: Demographic Balances and Indicators [online]. Luxembourg: Eurostat. [Cit. 2019-04-29]. Dostupné z: https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=proj_19ndbi〈=en
  15. Eurostat (2019b). Population and Social Conditions. Demography and Migration. Population Change - Crude Rates of Total Change, Natural Change and Net Migration Plus Adjustment [online]. Luxembourg: Eurostat. [Cit. 2019-07-15]. Dostupné z: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-datasets/-/tps00019
  16. Eurostat (2019c). Population: Structure Indicators [Demo_Pjanind]. Old Dependency Ratio 1st Variant (Population 65 and over to population 15 to 64 years). [online]. Luxembourg: Eurostat. [Cit. 2019-04-29]. Dostupné z: http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=demo_pjanind〈=en
  17. Eurostat (2019d). Population and Social Conditions [Demo_Find]. Total Fertility Rate. [online]. Luxembourg: Eurostat [Cit. 2019-07-15]. Dostupné z: https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=demo_find〈=en
  18. Eurostat (2019e). Population and Social Conditions [Demo_Mlexpec]. Life Expectancy at Age 65, by Sex. [online]. [Cit. 2019-07-15]. Luxembourg: Eurostat. Dostupné z: https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=demo_mlexpec〈=en
  19. Eurostat (2019f). Population Change - Demographic Balance and Crude Rates at National Level [Demo_Gind]. Crude Birth Rate. [online]. Luxembourg: Eurostat. [Cit. 2020-06-25]. Dostupné z: https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=demo_gind〈=en
  20. Eurostat (2020). Population and Social Conditions [Spr_Exp_Pens]. Pensions. [online]. [Cit. 2020-07-15]. Luxembourg: Eurostat. Dostupné z: https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=spr_exp_pens〈=en
  21. Fanti, L., Gori, L. (2012). Fertility and PAYG Pensions in the Overlapping Generations Model. Journal of Population Economics, 25(3), 955-961, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-011-0359-7 Go to original source...
  22. Hlaváček, M., Lakotová, L. (2019). Mezinárodní komparace výše veřejných výdajů na důchodový systém. Praha: Úřad Národní rozpočtové rady. [online]. [Cit. 2020-06-21]. Dostupné z: https://unrr.cz/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Informa%C4%8Dn%C3%AD-studie-Mezin%C3%A1rodn%C3%AD-srovn%C3%A1n%C3%AD-d%C5%AFchody_003p.pdf
  23. International Monetary Fund. The Challenge of Public Pension Reform in Advanced and Emerging Economies. Policy Papers No. 2011/101, https://doi.org/10.5089/9781498338059.007 Go to original source...
  24. Janíčko, M., Tsharakyan, A. (2013). K udržitelnosti průběžného důchodového systému v kontextu stárnutí populace v České republice. Politická ekonomie, 61(3), 321-337, https://doi.org/10.18267/j.polek.900 Go to original source...
  25. Kasek, L., Laursen, T., Skrok, E. (2008). Sustainability of Pension Systems in the New EU Member States and Croatia: Coping with Aging Challenges and Fiscal Pressures. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank. Go to original source...
  26. Keilman, N., Cruijsen, H., Alho, J. M. (2008). Changing Views of Future Demo Graphic Trends, in Alho, J. M., Jensen, S. E. H., Lassila, J., eds., Uncertain Demo Graphics and Fiscal Sustainability. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Go to original source...
  27. Langenus, G. (2006). Fiscal Sustainability Indicators and Policy Design in the Face of Aging. National Bank of Belgium. Bruxelles Working Paper No. 102, https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1687700 Go to original source...
  28. Lee, R. (2016). Macroeconomics, Aging, and Growth. Handbook of the Economics of Population Aging, 1, 59-118, https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hespa.2016.05.002 Go to original source...
  29. Loužek, M. (2014). Důchodová reforma. Praha: Karolinum Press. ISBN 978-80-246-2612-3.
  30. Národní rozpočtová rada (2020). Zpráva o dlouhodobé udržitelnosti veřejných financí. [online]. Praha: Národní rozpočtová rada. [Cit. 2020-06-21]. Dostupné z: https://unrr.cz/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Zpr%C3%A1va-o-dlouhodob%C3%A9-udr%C5%BEitelnosti-ve%C5%99ejn%C3%BDch-financ%C3%AD_2020_A.pdf
  31. Nařízení Evropského parlamentu a Rady (EU) 2019/1238 ze dne 20. června 2019 o panevropském osobním penzijním produktu (PEPP). [online]. [Cit. 2020-06-21]. Dostupné z: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/cs/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32019R1238
  32. OECD Statistics (2017a). Social Expenditure - Aggregated Data. Public. Old Age. Cash Benefits [online]. Paris: OECD Statistics. [Cit. 2019-06-04]. Dostupné z: https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?DataSetCode=SOCX_AGG
  33. OECD Statistics (2017b). Pension at a Glance. Funded Pensions Indicators. Gross Replacement Rate [online]. Paris: OECD Statistics. [Cit. 2019-06-04]. Dostupné z: https://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?queryid=46178
  34. OECD (2019a). Pensions at a Glance 2019. OECD and G20 Indicators. Country profiles of Pension Systems. [online]. Paris: OECD. [Cit. 2020-06-21]. Dostupné z: https://www.oecd.org/publications/oecd-pensions-at-a-glance-19991363.htm
  35. OECD (2019b). Financial Incentives for Funded Private Pension Plans: OECD Country Profiles. [online]. Paris: OECD. [Cit. 2020-06-21]. Dostupné z: https://www.oecd.org/pensions/private-pensions/Financial-Incentives-for-Funded-Pension-Plans-in-OECD-Countries-2019.pdf
  36. Palmer, E. (2012). Generic NDC: Equilibrium, Valuation, and Risk Sharing Withand without NDC Bonds, in Holzmann, R., Palmer, E., Robalino, D., eds., Nonfinancial Defined Contribution Pension Schemes in a Changing Pension World, https://doi.org/10.1596/9780821394786_ch19 Go to original source...
  37. Podger, A., Su, T. T., Wanna, J., et al. (eds.) (2018). Value for Money: Budget and Financial Management Reform in the People's Republic of China, Taiwan and Australia. Canberra: ANU Press, https://doi.org/10.22459/VM.01.2018 Go to original source...
  38. Razin, A., Sadka, E., Swagel, P. (2002). The Aging Population and the Size of the Welfare State. Journal of Political Economy, 110(4), 900-918, https://doi.org/10.3386/w8405 Go to original source...
  39. Šlapák, M. (2016). Institut dlouhodobých vdovských a vdoveckých důchodů pohledem mezinárodního srovnání (vědecké stati). Scientia et Societas, 12(2), 96-105. Dostupné z: http://files.sets.cz/200000211-81456823c7/2016_02_sets.pdf
  40. Vostatek, J. (2015). Sdílení penzí a dělení penzijních nároků. Důchodová komise [online]. Důchodová komise. [Cit. 2020-06-21]. Dostupné z: http://www.duchodova-komise.cz/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/J.-Vostatek-Sd%C3%ADlen%C3%AD-penz%C3%AD-a-d%C4%9Blen%C3%AD-penzijn%C3%ADch-n%C3%A1rok%C5%AF-16.-z%C3%A1%C5%99%C3%AD-2015.pdf

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.