Politická ekonomie 2025, 73(3):447-470 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.1459

A Policy Dilemma in the Context of Turkey's Sectoral Export Competitiveness: The Role of Exchange Rates and Labour Costs

Mücahid Samet Yilmaz ORCID..., Mustafa Acar ORCID...
Mücahid Samet Yilmaz (corresponding author), Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey
Mustafa Acar, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey

Production in Turkey has a high dependence on imported inputs. Therefore, the policy aiming at increasing exports through the depreciated national currency leads to different results depending on the degree of dependence on imported inputs. In this context, this study econometrically analyses increases in exports of manufacturing and service industries which have different levels of imported input dependence. The analysis findings indicate that national currency depreciation leads to competitive effects in the manufacturing industry, but not in the service sector. The effect of labour costs, on the other hand, is much lower in the manufacturing industry than in services. In addition, we found that the unit value index of crude material imports has a significant negative impact on the sectoral competitiveness of the manufacturing industry. In contrast, changes in import prices seem to have no significant impact on service exports.

Keywords: Exports, competitiveness, imported inputs, sectoral input differences, exchange rate policy, lower-valued domestic currency
JEL classification: F14, L60, L80

Received: May 7, 2024; Revised: August 16, 2024; Accepted: August 26, 2024; Prepublished online: June 17, 2025; Published: June 19, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Samet Yilmaz, M., & Acar, M. (2025). A Policy Dilemma in the Context of Turkey's Sectoral Export Competitiveness: The Role of Exchange Rates and Labour Costs. Politická ekonomie, 73(3), 447-470. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.1459
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Abeysinghe, T., & Yeok, T. L. (1998). Exchange Rate Appreciation and Export Competitiveness. The Case of Singapore. Applied Economics, 30(1), 51-55. Go to original source...
    2. Acaravci, A., & Öztürk, İ. (2002). Döviz Kurundaki Değişkenliğin Türkiye İhracati Üzerine Etkisi: Ampirik Bir Çalişma. Review of Social, Economic & Business Studies, 2, 197-206.
    3. Akbostanci, E. (2004). Dynamics of the Trade Balance: The Turkish J-Curve. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 40(5), 57-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/1540496X.2004.11052584 Go to original source...
    4. Akçay, Ü. (2023). Türkiye'de 2002-2023 Arasi Uygulanan Para Politikalarinin Ekonomi Politiği. ODTÜ Gelişme Dergisi, 50, 195-236. Go to original source...
    5. Albu, N., Joebges, H., & Zwiener, R. (2022). An Input-Output Analysis of Unit Labour Cost Developments of the German Manufacturing Sector since the Mid-1990s. Journal for Labour Market Research, 56(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12651-022-00306-7 Go to original source...
    6. Alper, A. E. (2023). Türkiye'de Döviz Kuru ve Diş Ticaret İlişkisi: Fourier Bootstrap Toda Yamamoto Nedensellik Testi Bulgulari. Fiscaoeconomia, 7(2), 1391-1401. https://doi.org/10.25295/fsecon.1259216 Go to original source...
    7. Avci, M., Uysal, S., & Taşçi, R. (2016). Türk İmalat Sanayinin Teknolojik Yapisi Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme. Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Araştirmalari Dergisi, 17(36), Article 36.
    8. Ayhan, F. (2019). Türkiye Ekonomisinde Döviz Kuru Oynakliğinin Diş Ticaret Üzerindeki Etkisinin Analizi. Business and Economics Research Journal, 10(3), 629-647. https://doi.org/10.20409/berj.2019.190 Go to original source...
    9. Azgün, S. (2013). Türkiye'de Döviz Kuru Hareketlerinin İç Fiyatlara (İthalat Fiyatlari, ÜFE ve TÜFE) Geçişi. Sosyoekonomi, 2, Article 20. https://doi.org/10.17233/se.41729 Go to original source...
    10. Balcilar, M., Algan, N., Demiral, M., & Bal, H. (2014). Türkiye'nin İhracat Performansi: İhracat Hacminin Temel Belirleyicilerinin İncelenmesi (1995-2012). Ege Akademik Bakiş, 14(3), Article 3. Go to original source...
    11. Born, B., & Breitung, J. (2016). Testing for Serial Correlation in Fixed-Effects Panel Data Models. Econometric Reviews, 35(7), 1290-1316. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2014.976524 Go to original source...
    12. Bozdan, D., Özenci̇, İ., & Keski̇n Benli̇, Y. (2018). Döviz Kuru ile İhracat ve İthalat Arasindaki İlişkinin Analizi: Ampirik Bir Çalişma. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(25), 638-649. https://doi.org/10.20875/makusobed.457585 Go to original source...
    13. Çalişkan Çavdar, Ş. (2011). Diş Ticaret Hadleri ve Reel Döviz Kuru İlişkisi Türkiye Örneği. E-Journal Of New World Science Academy, 6(4), 455-463.
    14. Campa, J. M., & Goldberg, L. S. (2008). Pass-Through of Exchange Rates to Consumption Prices: What Has Changed and Why? In International Financial Issues in the Pacific Rim: Global Imbalances, Financial Liberalization, and Exchange Rate Policy (pp. 139-176). National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. https://ideas.repec.org//h/nbr/nberch/6982.html Go to original source...
    15. Çeli̇k, R. (2018). The Effect of Exchange Rate Volatility on Export: The Case of Turkey (1995-2017). İstanbul İktisat Dergisi, 68(1), 181-220. https://doi.org/10.26650/ISTJECON404747 Go to original source...
    16. Central Bank of the Republic of Türkiye. (2024). CBRT. https://evds2.tcmb.gov.tr/
    17. Clark, C. (1960). The Conditions of Economic Progress (3rd ed.). St. Martin's Press. https://www.abebooks.com/Conditions-Economic-Progress-Clark-Colin/30645378806/bd
    18. Değer, O., & Demi̇r, M. (2015). Reel Efektif Döviz Kuru ve Diş Ticaret Hacmi Arasindaki Nedensellik İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği. Finans Politik ve Ekonomik Yorumlar, 604, Article 604.
    19. Doğan, Ç., & Karagöz, M. (2005). Döviz Kuru Diş Ticaret İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği. Firat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(2), Article 2.
    20. Driscoll, J. C., & Kraay, A. C. (1998). Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Spatially Dependent Panel Data. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 549-560. Go to original source...
    21. Durmaz, N. (2015). Industry Level Curve in Turkey. Journal of Economic Studies, 42(4), 689-706. https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-08-2013-0122 Go to original source...
    22. Eichengreen, B. (2021). Bretton Woods After 50. Review of Political Economy, 33(4), 552-569. https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2021.1952011 Go to original source...
    23. Erduman, Y., Eren, O., & Gül, S. (2019). The Evolution of Import Content of Production and Exports in Turkey: 2002-2017. 19(9).
    24. Erkekoğlu, H., & Gül, G. (2020). 2003-2017 Dönemi İçin Türkiye'de Ekonomik Büyüme, Reel Döviz Kuru ve Diş Ticaret İlişkisi: Granger Nedensellik Analizi. Aydin İktisat Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(2), Article 2.
    25. Ersungur, Ş. M., & Kiziltan, A. (2010). Türkiye Ekonomisinde İthalata Bağimliliğin Gird-Çikti Yöntemiyle Analizi. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(1), Article 1.
    26. European Central Bank. (2021). Dominant Currencies and the Export Supply Channel. Publications Office. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2866/478644
    27. Fang, W., Lai, Y., & Miller, S. M. (2006). Export Promotion through Exchange Rate Changes: Exchange Rate Depreciation or Stabilization? Southern Economic Journal, 72(3), 611-626. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2325-8012.2006.tb00723.x Go to original source...
    28. Fiıera, B., & Horváth, R. (2022). Are Exchange Rates Less Important for Trade in a More Globalized World? Evidence for the New EU Members. Economic Systems, 46(1), 100868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2021.100868 Go to original source...
    29. Fleming, J. M. (1962). Domestic Financial Policies under Fixed and under Floating Exchange Rates. Staff Papers - International Monetary Fund, 9(3), 369. https://doi.org/10.2307/3866091 Go to original source...
    30. Gözen, M. Ç., & Bostanci, F. C. (2021). Validity of J-Curve for Turkey and Its Main External Trade Partners: An Application of a Panel Data Approach. Sosyoekonomi, 29(50), 149-168. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2021.04.08 Go to original source...
    31. Greenaway, D., Kneller, R., & Zhang, X. (2010). The Effect of Exchange Rates on Firm Exports: The Role of Imported Intermediate Inputs. The World Economy, 33(8), 961-986. Go to original source...
    32. Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric Analysis. Prentice Hall.
    33. Gül, E., & Eki̇nci̇, A. (2006). Türkiye'de Reel Döviz Kuru ile İhracat ve İthalat Arasindaki Nedensellik İlişkisi: 1990-2006. Dumlupinar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 16, Article 16.
    34. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification Tests in Econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827 Go to original source...
    35. Hausmann, R., Hwang, J., & Rodrik, D. (2007). What You Export Matters. Journal of Economic Growth, 12(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-006-9009-4 Go to original source...
    36. Hooper, P., & Kohlhagen, S. W. (1978). The Effect of Exchange Rate Uncertainty on the Prices and Volume of International Trade. Journal of International Economics, 8(4), 483-511. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(87)90001-8 Go to original source...
    37. Kaplan, E. A., & Dayioğlu, M. R. (2016). İhracatin Ekonomik ve Politik Belirleyicileri: Türkiye İçin Var Analizi Uygulamasi. Balkan Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 578-597.
    38. Kara, H., & Öğünç, F. (2012). Döviz Kuru ve ithalat Fiyatlarinin Yurt içi Fiyatlara Etkisi. İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 27(317), Article 317. https://doi.org/10.3848/iif.2012.317.3396 Go to original source...
    39. Karamelikli, H. (2016b). Linear and Nonlinear Dynamics of the Turkish Trade Balance. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 8(2), 70. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v8n2p70 Go to original source...
    40. Karameli̇kli̇, H. (2016a). Türkiye'nin Diş Ticaret Dengesinde J-Eğrisi Etkisi. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştirmalari Dergisi, 5(3), 389. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.16089 Go to original source...
    41. Kizildere, C., Kabadayi, B., & Emsen, Ö. S. (2015). Diş Ticaretin Döviz Kuru Değişimlerine Duyarliliği: Türkiye Üzerine Bir İnceleme. Uluslararasi İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, 12. https://doi.org/10.18092/ijeas.74487 Go to original source...
    42. Köse, N., Ay, A., & Topalli, N. (2008). Döviz Kuru Oynakliğinin İhracata Etkisi: Türkiye Örneği (1995-2008). Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(2), 25-45.
    43. Levene, H. (1960). Robust tests for equality of variances. Contributions to Probability and Statistics, 278-292.
    44. Magee, S. P. (1973). Currency Contracts, Pass-Through, and Devaluation. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 4(1), 303-325. Go to original source...
    45. Manavgat, G., & Kaya, A. A. (2016). Türk İmalat Sanayinin Uluslararasi Rekabet Gücünün Belirleyenleri: Panel Veri Analizi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 34(3), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.17065/huniibf.259127 Go to original source...
    46. Mundell, R. (1960). The Monetary Dynamics of International Adjustment under Fixed and Flexible Exchange Rates. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 74(2), 227-257. Go to original source...
    47. Okay, E., Baytar, R. A., & Saridoğan, E. (2011). Türkiye Ekonomisinde Döviz Kurundaki Değişimlerin Cari İşlemler Dengesi Üzerindeki Etkileri. İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 27(310), Article 310. https://doi.org/10.3848/iif.2012.310.3069 Go to original source...
    48. Paul, J., & Dhiman, R. (2021). Three Decades of Export Competitiveness Literature: Systematic Review, Synthesis and Future Research Agenda. International Marketing Review, 38(5), 1082-1111. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-12-2020-0295 Go to original source...
    49. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.572504 Go to original source...
    50. Polat, H. (2011). Türkiye Ekonomisinde İmalat Sanayi. Dicle Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(2), Article 2.
    51. Rowthorn, B., & Ramaswamy, R. (1997). Deindustrialization: Causes and Implications (IMF Working Paper 1997/042). International Monetary Fund. https://econpapers.repec.org/paper/imfimfwpa/1997_2f042.htm
    52. Sevim, C., & Dogan, T. T. (2016). Turkiye Ekonomisinde İhracat ve Doviz Kuru Oynakliği İlişkisi. Ege Academic Review, 16(2), 303-318. Go to original source...
    53. Sezer, S. (2017). The Effects of Real Exchange Rates and Income on the Trade Balance: A Second Generation Panel Data Analysis for Transition Economies and Turkey. In Theoretical and Applied Economics: Vol. XXIV (pp. 171-186). Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER. https://ideas.repec.org//a/agr/journl/vxxivy2017i2(611)p171-186.html
    54. Tapşin, G., & Karabulut, A. T. (2013). Reel Döviz Kuru, İthalat ve İhracat Arasindaki Nedensellik İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneği. 26, 190-205.
    55. Tari, R., & Yildirim, D. Ç. (2009). Döviz Kuru Belirsizliğinin İhracata Etkisi: Türkiye İçin Bir Uygulama. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 16(2), Article 2.
    56. Thirlwall, A. P. (1983). A Plain Man's Guide to Kaldor's Growth Laws. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 5(3), 345-358. Go to original source...
    57. Troıt, M., & Bojnec, İ. (2016). Export-Led Growth: The Case of the Slovenian and Estonian Economies. Post-Communist Economies, 28(3), 373-383. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2016.1184425 Go to original source...
    58. Turkish Statistical Institute. (2024). TURKSTAT. https://www.tuik.gov.tr/
    59. Türkyilmaz, S., Özer, M., & Kutlu, E. (2007). Döviz Kuru Oynakliği ile İthalat ve İhracat Arasindaki İlişkilerin Zaman Serisi Analizi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(2), Article 2.
    60. Wilson, P. (2001). Exchange Rates and the Trade Balance for Dynamic Asian Economies-Does the J-Curve Exist for Singapore, Malaysia, and Korea? Open Economies Review, 12(4), 389-413. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017982901034 Go to original source...
    61. Wolfe, M. (1955). The Concept of Economic Sectors. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(3), 402-402. https://doi.org/10.2307/1885848 Go to original source...
    62. Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data. The MIT Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt5hhcfr
    63. Yalçin, C., Saygili, Ş., Ci̇han, C., & Brand, T. H. (2012). Türkiye İmalat Sanayiinde İthal Girdi Kullanimi. Iktisat Isletme ve Finans, 27(321), 09-38. Go to original source...
    64. Yamak, R., & Korkmaz, A. (2011). Reel Döviz Kuru ve Diş Ticaret Dengesi İlişkisi. Istanbul University Econometrics and Statistics e-Journal, 2, Article 2.
    65. Yazici, M., & Ahmad Klasra, M. (2010). Import Content of Exports and J-Curve Effect. Applied Economics, 42(6), 769-776. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840701720846 Go to original source...
    66. Yülek, M. (2019). Uluslarin Yükselişi: İmalat, Ticaret, Sanayi Politikasi ve Ekonomik Kalkinma (G. K. Şahin, Trans.; 1st ed.). Kronik Kitap.
    67. Yülek, M. A. (2014). Hoş Olmayan Bir Reel Kur Aritmetiği. Business and Economics Research Journal, 5(3), 1-13.
    68. Yurtoğlu, Y. (2017). Reel Döviz Kuru ile İhracat Arasindaki Nedensellik İlişkisi: Türkiye Örneğin (1997-2015). Gazi İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 3(1), Article 1.
    69. Zengin, A. (2001). Reel Döviz Kuru Hareketleri ve Diş Ticaret Fiyatlari (Türkiye Ekonomisi Üzerine Ampirik Bulgular). Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 2(2), 27-41.
    70. Zia, U., & Mahmood, Z. (2013). Exchange Rate Depreciation and Export Price Competitiveness: The Case of Pakistani Manufacturing Industries. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 18(4), 529-542. https://doi.org/10.1080/13547860.2012.742722 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content