Politická ekonomie 2024, Volume 72(2), Special Issue: 203-227 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.1419

Sustainable Growth, Political Risk and Carbon Footprint: Do Energy Transition and Financial Expansion Matter?

Shuqing Yu ORCID..., Yi Zhou ORCID..., Qasim Raza Syed ORCID..., Dervis Kirikkaleli ORCID...
Shuqing Yu: Cheye (Hangzhou) Network Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 311200, Zhejiang, China
Yi Zhou (corresponding author): Internal Audit Department, Bank of Jiangsu, Nanjing 210000, Jiangsu, China
Qasim Raza Syed: ILMA University, Karachi, Pakistan
Dervis Kirikkaleli: Faculty of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Department of Banking and Finance, European University of Lefke, Lefke, Turkey; Adnan Kassar School of Business, Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon

Unclean energy consumption stimulates carbon footprint (CF) leading to increased environmental pollution. Renewable energy transition (ETN) can curb the CF; however, political risk can obstruct this process. Hence, this study analyses the connections between economic growth, ETN and CF by considering political risk and financial expansion in a panel of top 10 emitters from 1992 to 2020 using the method of moment quantile regressions (MM-QR). The results elucidate that ETN significantly reduces the CF in the top emitters. Thus, expanding the ETN is beneficial for reducing the CF and promoting sustainable development. Improving the political environment by reducing the political risk (POLR) helps curb the CF. The inverted U-shaped connection between CF and economic growth shows that increased growth can reduce CF if top emitters can continue to promote energy transition and political stability. The positive impact of financial expansion on CF becomes insignificant at higher quantiles. Finally, policy suggestions are discussed.

Keywords: Energy transition, sustainable development, political risk, carbon footprint, top emitters
JEL classification: O13, P18, Q01, Q56

Vloženo: 10. srpen 2023; Revidováno: 5. říjen 2023; Přijato: 23. říjen 2023; Zveřejněno online: 1. prosinec 2023; Zveřejněno: 1. květen 2024  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Yu, S., Zhou, Y., Syed, Q.R., & Kirikkaleli, D. (2024). Sustainable Growth, Political Risk and Carbon Footprint: Do Energy Transition and Financial Expansion Matter? Politická ekonomie72(Spec.issue), 203-227. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.1419
Stáhnout citaci

Reference

  1. Afshan, S., Ozturk, I., Yaqoob, T. (2022). Facilitating renewable energy transition, ecological innovations and stringent environmental policies to improve ecological sustainability: Evidence from MM-QR method. Renewable Energy, 196, 151-160, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.06.125 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  2. Ahmad, M., Ahmed, Z., Akbar, S., et al. (2023). Towards environmental sustainability in E-7 countries: Assessing the roles of natural resources, economic growth, country risk, and energy transition. Resources Policy, 82, 103486, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103486 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  3. Ahmad, M., Ahmed, Z., Riaz, M., et al. (2023). Modeling the linkage between climate-tech, energy transition, and CO2 emissions: Do environmental regulations matter? Gondwana Research, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.04.003 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  4. Ahmad, M., Ahmed, Z., Yang, X., et al. (2022). Financial development and environmental degradation: Do human capital and institutional quality make a difference? Gondwana Research, 105, 299-310, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2021.09.012 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  5. Ahmed, Z., Zhang, B., Cary, M. (2021). Linking economic globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: Evidence from symmetric and asymmetric ARDL. Ecological Indicators, 121, 107060, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107060 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  6. Akram, R., Chen, F., Khalid, F., et al. (2020). Heterogeneous effects of energy efficiency and renewable energy on carbon emissions: Evidence from developing countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 119122, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119122 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  7. Awosusi, A. A., Adebayo, T. S., Kirikkaleli, D., et al. (2022). Role of technological innovation and globalization in BRICS economies: policy towards environmental sustainability. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 29(7), 593-610, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2022.2059032 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  8. Awosusi, A. A., Rjoub, H., Dördüncü, H., et al. (2022). Does the potency of economic globalization and political instability reshape renewable energy usage in the face of environmental degradation? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-16, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23665-7 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  9. Baloch, M. A., Ozturk, I., Bekun, F. V., et al. (2020). Modeling the dynamic linkage between financial development, energy innovation, and environmental quality: Does globalization matter? Business Strategy and the Environment, 1-9, https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2615 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  10. Baloch, M. A., Zhang, J., Iqbal, K., et al. (2019). The effect of financial development on ecological footprint in BRI countries: evidence from panel data estimation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(6), 6199-6208, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3992-9 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  11. Balsalobre, D., Álvarez, A., Cantos, J. M. (2015). Public budgets for energy RD&D and the effects on energy intensity and pollution levels. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(7), 4881-4892, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3121-3 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  12. Ben Mbarek, M., Saidi, K., Rahman, M. M. (2018). Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, environmental degradation and economic growth in Tunisia. Quality and Quantity, 52(3), 1105-1119, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0506-7 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  13. Cheng, C., Ren, X., Wang, Z., et al. (2019). Heterogeneous impacts of renewable energy and environmental patents on CO2 emission Evidence from the BRIICS. Science of the Total Environment, 668, 1328-1338, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.063 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  14. Coleman, C. (2021). House of Lords Library. COP26: aims, goals and progress. London: House of Lords. Available at: https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/LLN-2021-0031/LLN-2021-0031.pdf
  15. Dai, J., Ahmed, Z., Alvarado, R., et al. (2023). Assessing the nexus between human capital, green energy, and load capacity factor: Policymaking for achieving sustainable development goals. Gondwana Research, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.04.009 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  16. Dai, J., Alvarado, R., Ali, S., et al. (2023). Transport infrastructure, economic growth, and transport CO2 emissions nexus: Does green energy consumption in the transport sector matter? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-25100-3 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  17. Danish, Baloch, M. A., Mahmood, N., Zhang, J. W. (2019). Effect of natural resources, renewable energy and economic development on CO2 emissions in BRICS countries. Science of the Total Environment, 678, 632-638, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.028 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  18. Destek, M. A., Aslan, A. (2020). Disaggregated renewable energy consumption and environmental pollution nexus in G-7 countries. Renewable Energy, 151, 1298-1306, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.138 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  19. Destek, M. A., Sarkodie, S. A. (2019). Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: The role of energy and financial development. Science of the Total Environment, 650, 2483-2489, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.017 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  20. Dogan, E., Seker, F. (2016). Determinants of CO2 emissions in the European Union: The role of renewable and non-renewable energy. Renewable Energy, 94, 429-439, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.078 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  21. Fakher, H. A., Ahmed, Z. (2023). Does financial development moderate the link between technological innovation and environmental indicators ? An advanced panel analysis. Financial Innovation, 9(1), 1-19, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00513-2 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  22. GFN (2023). Global Footprint Network. Oakland: Global Footprint Network. Available at: http://data.footprintnetwork.org
  23. Ghazouani, T., Boukhatem, J., Yan Sam, C. (2020). Causal interactions between trade openness, renewable electricity consumption, and economic growth in Asia-Pacific countries: Fresh evidence from a bootstrap ARDL approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 133, 110094, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110094 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  24. Grossman, G. M., Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353-377, https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  25. IEA (2023). Global Energy Review: CO2 emissions in 2021. IEA [online]. Available at: https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-co2-emissions-in-2021-2
  26. IMF (2023). Financial Development Index Database. IMF Data [online]. Available at: https://data.imf.org/?sk=F8032E80-B36C-43B1-AC26-493C5B1CD33B
  27. Kahouli, B., Hamdi, B., Nafla, A., et al. (2022). Investigating the relationship between ICT, green energy, total factor productivity, and ecological footprint: Empirical evidence from Saudi Arabia. Energy Strategy Reviews, 42, 100871, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100871 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  28. Kanat, O., Yan, Z., Asghar, M. M., et al. (2022). Do natural gas, oil, and coal consumption ameliorate environmental quality? Empirical evidence from Russia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(3), 4540-4556, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15989-7 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  29. Kartal, M. T., Depren, S. K., Kirikkaleli, D., et al. (2022). Asymmetric and long-run impact of political stability on consumption-based carbon dioxide emissions in Finland: Evidence from nonlinear and Fourier-based approaches. Journal of Environmental Management, 321, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116043 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  30. Kihombo, S., Ahmed, Z., Chen, S., et al. (2021). Linking financial development, economic growth, and ecological footprint: what is the role of technological innovation? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(43), 61235-61245, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14993-1 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  31. Kirikkaleli, D., Adebayo, T. S. (2021). Do renewable energy consumption and financial development matter for environmental sustainability? New global evidence. Sustainable Development, 29(4), 583-594, https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2159 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  32. Koengkan, M., Fuinhas, J. A. (2020). Exploring the effect of the renewable energy transition on CO2 emissions of Latin American & Caribbean countries. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 39(6), 515-538, https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2020.1731511 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  33. Lau, L. S., Choong, C. K., Eng, Y. K. (2014). Investigation of the environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions in Malaysia: Do foreign direct investment and trade matter? Energy Policy, 68, 490-497, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.002 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  34. Le, H. P., Ozturk, I. (2020). The impacts of globalization, financial development, government expenditures, and institutional quality on CO2 emissions in the presence of environmental Kuznets curve. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(18), 22680-22697, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08812-2 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  35. Machado, J. A. F., Santos Silva, J. M. C. (2019). Quantiles via moments. Journal of Econometrics, 213(1), 145-173, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JECONOM.2019.04.009 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  36. Majeed, M. T., Mazhar, M. (2019). Financial development and ecological footprint: A global panel data analysis. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Science, 13(2), 487-514, https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/201002
  37. Nasir, M. A., Duc Huynh, T. L., Xuan Tram, H. T. (2019). Role of financial development, economic growth & foreign direct investment in driving climate change: A case of emerging ASEAN. Journal of Environmental Management, 242, 131-141, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.112 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  38. Ntow-Gyamfi, M., Bokpin, G. A., Aboagye, A. Q. Q., et al. (2020). Environmental sustainability and financial development in Africa; does institutional quality play any role? Development Studies Research, 7(1), 93-118, https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2020.1798261 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  39. OWD (2023). Share of primary energy from renewable sources, 2022. Our World in Data [online].Available at: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/renewable-share-energy
  40. Paramati, S. R., Mo, D., Gupta, R. (2017). The effects of stock market growth and renewable energy use on CO2 emissions: Evidence from G20 countries. Energy Economics, 66, 360-371, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.06.025 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  41. Pata, U. K. (2018). The effect of urbanization and industrialization on carbon emissions in Turkey: evidence from ARDL bounds testing procedure. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(8), 7740-7747, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-1088-6 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  42. Pata, U. K. (2021). Do renewable energy and health expenditures improve load capacity factor in the USA and Japan? A new approach to environmental issues. European Journal of Health Economics, 22(9), 1427-1439, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-021-01321-0 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  43. Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 653-670, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.61.s1.14 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  44. Peng, G., Meng, F., Ahmed, Z., et al. (2022). A Path Towards Green Revolution: How do Environmental Technologies, Political Risk, and Environmental Taxes Influence Green Energy Consumption? Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 1-8, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.927333 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  45. Pesaran, H., Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142(1), 50-93, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  46. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels. University of Cambridge Working Papers in Economics No. 435. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  47. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross Section Dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 47(4), 265-312, https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  48. PRS Group (2021). ICRG methodology, Mount Pleasant: PRS Group. Available at: https://www.prsgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/icrgmethodology.pdf
  49. PRS Group (2023). International Country Risk Guide. PRS Group [online]. Available at: https://www.prsgroup.com/explore-our-products/international-country-risk-guide/
  50. Rizk, R., Slimane, M. B. (2018). Modelling the relationship between poverty, environment, and institutions: a panel data study. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(31), 31459-31473, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3051-6 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  51. Saud, S., Chen, S., Haseeb, A., et al. (2019). The nexus between financial development, income level, and environment in Central and Eastern European Countries: a perspective on Belt and Road Initiative. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(16), 16053-16075, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05004-5 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  52. Shahbaz, M., Hoang, T. H. V., Mahalik, M. K., et al. (2017). Energy consumption, financial development and economic growth in India: New evidence from a nonlinear and asymmetric analysis. Energy Economics, 63, 199-212, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.01.023 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  53. Shahbaz, M., Khraief, N., Uddin, G. S., et al. (2014). Environmental Kuznets curve in an open economy: A bounds testing and causality analysis for Tunisia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 34, 325-336, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.022 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  54. Sinha, A., Shahbaz, M. (2018). Estimation of Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 emission: Role of renewable energy generation in India. Renewable Energy, 119, 703-711, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.12.058 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  55. Statista (2021). Distribution of carbon dioxide emissions worldwide in 2021, by select country. Hamburg: Statista. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/271748/the-largest-emitters-of-co2-in-the-world/
  56. Statista (2022). Primary energy consumption worldwide in 2021, by country. Hamburg: Statista. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/263455primary-energy-consumption-of-selected-countries/
  57. Su, C. W., Umar, M., Khan, Z. (2021). Does fiscal decentralization and eco-innovation promote renewable energy consumption? Analyzing the role of political risk. Science of the Total Environment, 751, 142220, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142220 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  58. Su, Z. W., Umar, M., Kirikkaleli, D., et al. (2021). Role of political risk to achieve carbon neutrality: Evidence from Brazil. Journal of Environmental Management, 298, 113463, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113463 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  59. Suki, Noraz. M., Suki, Norb. M., Sharif, A., et al. (2022). The role of technology innovation and renewable energy in reducing environmental degradation in Malaysia: A step towards sustainable environment. Renewable Energy, 182, 245-253, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.007 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  60. Sun, Y., Guan, W., Mehmood, U., et al. (2022). Asymmetric impacts of natural resources on ecological footprints: Exploring the role of economic growth, FDI and renewable energy in G-11 countries. Resources Policy, 79, 103026, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103026 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  61. Tang, T., Shahzad, F., Ahmed, Z., et al. (2022). Energy transition for meeting ecological goals: Do economic stability, technology, and government stability matter? Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 1-13, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.955494 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  62. Uddin, G. A., Salahuddin, M., Alam, K., et al. (2017). Ecological footprint and real income: Panel data evidence from the 27 highest emitting countries. Ecological Indicators, 77, 166-175, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.01.003 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  63. Ulucak, R., Bilgili, F. (2018). A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 144-157, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.191 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  64. Usman, O., Iorember, P. T., Olanipekun, I. O. (2019). Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in India: The effects of energy consumption and democracy. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(13), 13390-13400, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04696-z Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  65. Wang, Z., Chandavuth, Y., Zhang, B., et al. (2023). Environmental degradation, renewable energy, and economic growth nexus: Assessing the role of financial and political risks? Journal of Environmental Management, 325, 116678, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116678 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  66. WB (2023). World Development Indicators (WDI). World Bank Data Topics[online]. Available at: https://datatopics.worldbank.org/world-development-indicators/
  67. Westerlund, J. (2007). Testing for Error Correction in Panel Data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69(6), 709-748, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
  68. Zhang, W., Chiu, Y.-B. (2020). Do country risks influence carbon dioxide emissions? A non-linear perspective. Energy, 206, 118048, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118048 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...

Tento článek je publikován v režimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), která umožňuje nekomerční distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.