Politická ekonomie 2024, Volume 72(2), Special Issue: 203-227 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.1419

Sustainable Growth, Political Risk and Carbon Footprint: Do Energy Transition and Financial Expansion Matter?

Shuqing Yu ORCID..., Yi Zhou ORCID..., Qasim Raza Syed ORCID..., Dervis Kirikkaleli ORCID...
Shuqing Yu: Cheye (Hangzhou) Network Technology Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 311200, Zhejiang, China
Yi Zhou (corresponding author): Internal Audit Department, Bank of Jiangsu, Nanjing 210000, Jiangsu, China
Qasim Raza Syed: ILMA University, Karachi, Pakistan
Dervis Kirikkaleli: Faculty of Economic and Administrative Sciences, Department of Banking and Finance, European University of Lefke, Lefke, Turkey; Adnan Kassar School of Business, Lebanese American University, Beirut, Lebanon

Unclean energy consumption stimulates carbon footprint (CF) leading to increased environmental pollution. Renewable energy transition (ETN) can curb the CF; however, political risk can obstruct this process. Hence, this study analyses the connections between economic growth, ETN and CF by considering political risk and financial expansion in a panel of top 10 emitters from 1992 to 2020 using the method of moment quantile regressions (MM-QR). The results elucidate that ETN significantly reduces the CF in the top emitters. Thus, expanding the ETN is beneficial for reducing the CF and promoting sustainable development. Improving the political environment by reducing the political risk (POLR) helps curb the CF. The inverted U-shaped connection between CF and economic growth shows that increased growth can reduce CF if top emitters can continue to promote energy transition and political stability. The positive impact of financial expansion on CF becomes insignificant at higher quantiles. Finally, policy suggestions are discussed.

Keywords: Energy transition, sustainable development, political risk, carbon footprint, top emitters
JEL classification: O13, P18, Q01, Q56

Received: August 10, 2023; Revised: October 5, 2023; Accepted: October 23, 2023; Prepublished online: December 1, 2023; Published: May 1, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Yu, S., Zhou, Y., Syed, Q.R., & Kirikkaleli, D. (2024). Sustainable Growth, Political Risk and Carbon Footprint: Do Energy Transition and Financial Expansion Matter? Politická ekonomie, 72(Spec.issue), 203-227. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.1419
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Afshan, S., Ozturk, I., Yaqoob, T. (2022). Facilitating renewable energy transition, ecological innovations and stringent environmental policies to improve ecological sustainability: Evidence from MM-QR method. Renewable Energy, 196, 151-160, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.06.125 Go to original source...
    2. Ahmad, M., Ahmed, Z., Akbar, S., et al. (2023). Towards environmental sustainability in E-7 countries: Assessing the roles of natural resources, economic growth, country risk, and energy transition. Resources Policy, 82, 103486, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103486 Go to original source...
    3. Ahmad, M., Ahmed, Z., Riaz, M., et al. (2023). Modeling the linkage between climate-tech, energy transition, and CO2 emissions: Do environmental regulations matter? Gondwana Research, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.04.003 Go to original source...
    4. Ahmad, M., Ahmed, Z., Yang, X., et al. (2022). Financial development and environmental degradation: Do human capital and institutional quality make a difference? Gondwana Research, 105, 299-310, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2021.09.012 Go to original source...
    5. Ahmed, Z., Zhang, B., Cary, M. (2021). Linking economic globalization, economic growth, financial development, and ecological footprint: Evidence from symmetric and asymmetric ARDL. Ecological Indicators, 121, 107060, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.107060 Go to original source...
    6. Akram, R., Chen, F., Khalid, F., et al. (2020). Heterogeneous effects of energy efficiency and renewable energy on carbon emissions: Evidence from developing countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 119122, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119122 Go to original source...
    7. Awosusi, A. A., Adebayo, T. S., Kirikkaleli, D., et al. (2022). Role of technological innovation and globalization in BRICS economies: policy towards environmental sustainability. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 29(7), 593-610, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2022.2059032 Go to original source...
    8. Awosusi, A. A., Rjoub, H., Dördüncü, H., et al. (2022). Does the potency of economic globalization and political instability reshape renewable energy usage in the face of environmental degradation? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1-16, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23665-7 Go to original source...
    9. Baloch, M. A., Ozturk, I., Bekun, F. V., et al. (2020). Modeling the dynamic linkage between financial development, energy innovation, and environmental quality: Does globalization matter? Business Strategy and the Environment, 1-9, https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2615 Go to original source...
    10. Baloch, M. A., Zhang, J., Iqbal, K., et al. (2019). The effect of financial development on ecological footprint in BRI countries: evidence from panel data estimation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(6), 6199-6208, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3992-9 Go to original source...
    11. Balsalobre, D., Álvarez, A., Cantos, J. M. (2015). Public budgets for energy RD&D and the effects on energy intensity and pollution levels. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 22(7), 4881-4892, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-014-3121-3 Go to original source...
    12. Ben Mbarek, M., Saidi, K., Rahman, M. M. (2018). Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, environmental degradation and economic growth in Tunisia. Quality and Quantity, 52(3), 1105-1119, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0506-7 Go to original source...
    13. Cheng, C., Ren, X., Wang, Z., et al. (2019). Heterogeneous impacts of renewable energy and environmental patents on CO2 emission Evidence from the BRIICS. Science of the Total Environment, 668, 1328-1338, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.063 Go to original source...
    14. Coleman, C. (2021). House of Lords Library. COP26: aims, goals and progress. London: House of Lords. Available at: https://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/LLN-2021-0031/LLN-2021-0031.pdf
    15. Dai, J., Ahmed, Z., Alvarado, R., et al. (2023). Assessing the nexus between human capital, green energy, and load capacity factor: Policymaking for achieving sustainable development goals. Gondwana Research, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.04.009 Go to original source...
    16. Dai, J., Alvarado, R., Ali, S., et al. (2023). Transport infrastructure, economic growth, and transport CO2 emissions nexus: Does green energy consumption in the transport sector matter? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-25100-3 Go to original source...
    17. Danish, Baloch, M. A., Mahmood, N., Zhang, J. W. (2019). Effect of natural resources, renewable energy and economic development on CO2 emissions in BRICS countries. Science of the Total Environment, 678, 632-638, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.028 Go to original source...
    18. Destek, M. A., Aslan, A. (2020). Disaggregated renewable energy consumption and environmental pollution nexus in G-7 countries. Renewable Energy, 151, 1298-1306, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.138 Go to original source...
    19. Destek, M. A., Sarkodie, S. A. (2019). Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: The role of energy and financial development. Science of the Total Environment, 650, 2483-2489, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.017 Go to original source...
    20. Dogan, E., Seker, F. (2016). Determinants of CO2 emissions in the European Union: The role of renewable and non-renewable energy. Renewable Energy, 94, 429-439, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.078 Go to original source...
    21. Fakher, H. A., Ahmed, Z. (2023). Does financial development moderate the link between technological innovation and environmental indicators ? An advanced panel analysis. Financial Innovation, 9(1), 1-19, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854-023-00513-2 Go to original source...
    22. GFN (2023). Global Footprint Network. Oakland: Global Footprint Network. Available at: http://data.footprintnetwork.org
    23. Ghazouani, T., Boukhatem, J., Yan Sam, C. (2020). Causal interactions between trade openness, renewable electricity consumption, and economic growth in Asia-Pacific countries: Fresh evidence from a bootstrap ARDL approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 133, 110094, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110094 Go to original source...
    24. Grossman, G. M., Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353-377, https://doi.org/10.2307/2118443 Go to original source...
    25. IEA (2023). Global Energy Review: CO2 emissions in 2021. IEA [online]. Available at: https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-co2-emissions-in-2021-2
    26. IMF (2023). Financial Development Index Database. IMF Data [online]. Available at: https://data.imf.org/?sk=F8032E80-B36C-43B1-AC26-493C5B1CD33B
    27. Kahouli, B., Hamdi, B., Nafla, A., et al. (2022). Investigating the relationship between ICT, green energy, total factor productivity, and ecological footprint: Empirical evidence from Saudi Arabia. Energy Strategy Reviews, 42, 100871, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2022.100871 Go to original source...
    28. Kanat, O., Yan, Z., Asghar, M. M., et al. (2022). Do natural gas, oil, and coal consumption ameliorate environmental quality? Empirical evidence from Russia. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(3), 4540-4556, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15989-7 Go to original source...
    29. Kartal, M. T., Depren, S. K., Kirikkaleli, D., et al. (2022). Asymmetric and long-run impact of political stability on consumption-based carbon dioxide emissions in Finland: Evidence from nonlinear and Fourier-based approaches. Journal of Environmental Management, 321, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116043 Go to original source...
    30. Kihombo, S., Ahmed, Z., Chen, S., et al. (2021). Linking financial development, economic growth, and ecological footprint: what is the role of technological innovation? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(43), 61235-61245, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14993-1 Go to original source...
    31. Kirikkaleli, D., Adebayo, T. S. (2021). Do renewable energy consumption and financial development matter for environmental sustainability? New global evidence. Sustainable Development, 29(4), 583-594, https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2159 Go to original source...
    32. Koengkan, M., Fuinhas, J. A. (2020). Exploring the effect of the renewable energy transition on CO2 emissions of Latin American & Caribbean countries. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 39(6), 515-538, https://doi.org/10.1080/14786451.2020.1731511 Go to original source...
    33. Lau, L. S., Choong, C. K., Eng, Y. K. (2014). Investigation of the environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions in Malaysia: Do foreign direct investment and trade matter? Energy Policy, 68, 490-497, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.002 Go to original source...
    34. Le, H. P., Ozturk, I. (2020). The impacts of globalization, financial development, government expenditures, and institutional quality on CO2 emissions in the presence of environmental Kuznets curve. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(18), 22680-22697, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08812-2 Go to original source...
    35. Machado, J. A. F., Santos Silva, J. M. C. (2019). Quantiles via moments. Journal of Econometrics, 213(1), 145-173, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JECONOM.2019.04.009 Go to original source...
    36. Majeed, M. T., Mazhar, M. (2019). Financial development and ecological footprint: A global panel data analysis. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Science, 13(2), 487-514, https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/201002
    37. Nasir, M. A., Duc Huynh, T. L., Xuan Tram, H. T. (2019). Role of financial development, economic growth & foreign direct investment in driving climate change: A case of emerging ASEAN. Journal of Environmental Management, 242, 131-141, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.03.112 Go to original source...
    38. Ntow-Gyamfi, M., Bokpin, G. A., Aboagye, A. Q. Q., et al. (2020). Environmental sustainability and financial development in Africa; does institutional quality play any role? Development Studies Research, 7(1), 93-118, https://doi.org/10.1080/21665095.2020.1798261 Go to original source...
    39. OWD (2023). Share of primary energy from renewable sources, 2022. Our World in Data [online].Available at: https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/renewable-share-energy
    40. Paramati, S. R., Mo, D., Gupta, R. (2017). The effects of stock market growth and renewable energy use on CO2 emissions: Evidence from G20 countries. Energy Economics, 66, 360-371, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.06.025 Go to original source...
    41. Pata, U. K. (2018). The effect of urbanization and industrialization on carbon emissions in Turkey: evidence from ARDL bounds testing procedure. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(8), 7740-7747, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-1088-6 Go to original source...
    42. Pata, U. K. (2021). Do renewable energy and health expenditures improve load capacity factor in the USA and Japan? A new approach to environmental issues. European Journal of Health Economics, 22(9), 1427-1439, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-021-01321-0 Go to original source...
    43. Pedroni, P. (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 653-670, https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.61.s1.14 Go to original source...
    44. Peng, G., Meng, F., Ahmed, Z., et al. (2022). A Path Towards Green Revolution: How do Environmental Technologies, Political Risk, and Environmental Taxes Influence Green Energy Consumption? Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 1-8, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.927333 Go to original source...
    45. Pesaran, H., Yamagata, T. (2008). Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. Journal of Econometrics, 142(1), 50-93, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2007.05.010 Go to original source...
    46. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels. University of Cambridge Working Papers in Economics No. 435. Go to original source...
    47. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in the Presence of Cross Section Dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 47(4), 265-312, https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951 Go to original source...
    48. PRS Group (2021). ICRG methodology, Mount Pleasant: PRS Group. Available at: https://www.prsgroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/icrgmethodology.pdf
    49. PRS Group (2023). International Country Risk Guide. PRS Group [online]. Available at: https://www.prsgroup.com/explore-our-products/international-country-risk-guide/
    50. Rizk, R., Slimane, M. B. (2018). Modelling the relationship between poverty, environment, and institutions: a panel data study. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(31), 31459-31473, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3051-6 Go to original source...
    51. Saud, S., Chen, S., Haseeb, A., et al. (2019). The nexus between financial development, income level, and environment in Central and Eastern European Countries: a perspective on Belt and Road Initiative. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(16), 16053-16075, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05004-5 Go to original source...
    52. Shahbaz, M., Hoang, T. H. V., Mahalik, M. K., et al. (2017). Energy consumption, financial development and economic growth in India: New evidence from a nonlinear and asymmetric analysis. Energy Economics, 63, 199-212, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.01.023 Go to original source...
    53. Shahbaz, M., Khraief, N., Uddin, G. S., et al. (2014). Environmental Kuznets curve in an open economy: A bounds testing and causality analysis for Tunisia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 34, 325-336, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.022 Go to original source...
    54. Sinha, A., Shahbaz, M. (2018). Estimation of Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 emission: Role of renewable energy generation in India. Renewable Energy, 119, 703-711, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.12.058 Go to original source...
    55. Statista (2021). Distribution of carbon dioxide emissions worldwide in 2021, by select country. Hamburg: Statista. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/271748/the-largest-emitters-of-co2-in-the-world/
    56. Statista (2022). Primary energy consumption worldwide in 2021, by country. Hamburg: Statista. Available at: https://www.statista.com/statistics/263455primary-energy-consumption-of-selected-countries/
    57. Su, C. W., Umar, M., Khan, Z. (2021). Does fiscal decentralization and eco-innovation promote renewable energy consumption? Analyzing the role of political risk. Science of the Total Environment, 751, 142220, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142220 Go to original source...
    58. Su, Z. W., Umar, M., Kirikkaleli, D., et al. (2021). Role of political risk to achieve carbon neutrality: Evidence from Brazil. Journal of Environmental Management, 298, 113463, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113463 Go to original source...
    59. Suki, Noraz. M., Suki, Norb. M., Sharif, A., et al. (2022). The role of technology innovation and renewable energy in reducing environmental degradation in Malaysia: A step towards sustainable environment. Renewable Energy, 182, 245-253, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.10.007 Go to original source...
    60. Sun, Y., Guan, W., Mehmood, U., et al. (2022). Asymmetric impacts of natural resources on ecological footprints: Exploring the role of economic growth, FDI and renewable energy in G-11 countries. Resources Policy, 79, 103026, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103026 Go to original source...
    61. Tang, T., Shahzad, F., Ahmed, Z., et al. (2022). Energy transition for meeting ecological goals: Do economic stability, technology, and government stability matter? Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 1-13, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.955494 Go to original source...
    62. Uddin, G. A., Salahuddin, M., Alam, K., et al. (2017). Ecological footprint and real income: Panel data evidence from the 27 highest emitting countries. Ecological Indicators, 77, 166-175, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.01.003 Go to original source...
    63. Ulucak, R., Bilgili, F. (2018). A reinvestigation of EKC model by ecological footprint measurement for high, middle and low income countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 188, 144-157, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.191 Go to original source...
    64. Usman, O., Iorember, P. T., Olanipekun, I. O. (2019). Revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in India: The effects of energy consumption and democracy. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(13), 13390-13400, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-04696-z Go to original source...
    65. Wang, Z., Chandavuth, Y., Zhang, B., et al. (2023). Environmental degradation, renewable energy, and economic growth nexus: Assessing the role of financial and political risks? Journal of Environmental Management, 325, 116678, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116678 Go to original source...
    66. WB (2023). World Development Indicators (WDI). World Bank Data Topics[online]. Available at: https://datatopics.worldbank.org/world-development-indicators/
    67. Westerlund, J. (2007). Testing for Error Correction in Panel Data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69(6), 709-748, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2007.00477.x Go to original source...
    68. Zhang, W., Chiu, Y.-B. (2020). Do country risks influence carbon dioxide emissions? A non-linear perspective. Energy, 206, 118048, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.118048 Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content