Politická ekonomie 2024, 72(1):122-141 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.1410

Unemployment and Labour Force Participation in South Korea: Johansen-Type Cointegration Analysis with a Fourier Approach

Veli Yilanci ORCID..., Onder Ozgur ORCID...
Veli Yilanci: Faculty of Political Sciences, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University: Çanakkale, Turkey, e-mail: veli.yilanci@comu.edu.tr
Onder Ozgur: (corresponding author), Faculty of Political Sciences, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey, e-mail: oozgur@aybu.edu.tr

This study examines the long-run relationship between the unemployment rate and labour force participation rate in South Korea from June 1999 to January 2023. The study utilizes the traditional Johansen cointegration test and augments it with Fourier terms to control for an unknown number of breaks in the cointegration system. The empirical findings suggest a significant long-run relationship between the unemployment rate and labour force participation rate in South Korea, which provides evidence against the unemployment invariance hypothesis. The study also finds evidence of the discouraged-worker effect for males and the added-worker effect for females. The findings of this study have important implications for policymakers in creating more effective plans to lower unemployment and foster economic growth in South Korea. This study contributes to the literature by clarifying the validity of the unemployment invariance hypothesis in the South Korean economy, which is regarded as a growth miracle in the literature. Instead of using the standard configuration of dummy variables, the Johansen cointegration technique now has the ability to adjust for an unknown number of multiple structural breaks in the cointegration system.

Keywords: Unemployment rate, labour force participation rate, unemployment invariance hypothesis, cointegration, Fourier approximation, structural breaks, Korean labour market
JEL classification: E24, J64, O53

Received: April 22, 2023; Revised: August 12, 2023; Accepted: August 21, 2023; Prepublished online: January 31, 2024; Published: February 27, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Yilanci, V., & Ozgur, O. (2024). Unemployment and Labour Force Participation in South Korea: Johansen-Type Cointegration Analysis with a Fourier Approach. Politická ekonomie72(1), 122-141. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.1410
Download citation

References

  1. Altuzarra, A., Gálvez Gálvez, C., González Flores, A. (2019). Unemployment and labour force participation in Spain. Applied Economics Letters, 26(5), 345-350. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2018.1470312 Go to original source...
  2. Aum, S., Sang Y. T. L., Yongseok, S. (2020). COVID-19 Doesn't Need Lockdowns to Destroy Jobs: The Effect of Local Outbreaks in Korea. NBER Working Paper No. 27264. https://doi.org/10.3386/w27264 Go to original source...
  3. Becker, R., Enders, W., Hurn, S. (2004). A general test for time dependence in parameters. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 19(7), 899-906. Go to original source...
  4. Becker, R., Enders, W., Lee, J. (2006). A stationarity test in the presence of an unknown number of smooth breaks. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 27(3), 381-409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9892.2006.00478.x Go to original source...
  5. Campos, J., Ericsson, N. R., Hendry, D. F. (1996). Cointegration tests in the presence of structural breaks. Journal of Econometrics, 70(1), 187-220. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01689-5 Go to original source...
  6. Claveria, O., Sorić, P. (2023). Labour market uncertainty after the irruption of COVID-19. Empirical Economics, 64(4), 1897-1945. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-022-02304-7 Go to original source...
  7. Congregado, E., Gałecka-Burdziak, E., Golpe, A. A., et al. (2021). Unemployment invariance hypothesis and structural breaks in Poland. Journal of Economic Asymmetries, 24, e00198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeca.2021.e00198 Go to original source...
  8. Emerson, J. (2011). Unemployment and labor force participation in the United States. Economics Letters, 111(3), 203-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.02.022 Go to original source...
  9. Enders, W., Lee, J. (2012). The flexible Fourier form and Dickey-Fuller type unit root tests. Economics Letters, 117(1), 196-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.04.081 Go to original source...
  10. Goolsbee, A., Syverson, C. (2021). Fear, lockdown, and diversion: Comparing drivers of pandemic economic decline 2020. Journal of Public Economics, 193, 104311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104311 Go to original source...
  11. Hjalmarsson, E., Österholm, P. (2010). Testing for cointegration using the Johansen methodology when variables are near-integrated: Size distortions and partial remedies. Empirical Economics, 39, 51-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-009-0294-6 Go to original source...
  12. Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 12(2-3), 231-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1889(88)90041-3 Go to original source...
  13. Johansen, S. (1991). Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 59(6), 1551-1580. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938278 Go to original source...
  14. Kakinaka, M., Miyamoto, H. (2012). Unemployment and labour force participation in Japan. Applied Economics Letters, 19(11), 1039-1043. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2011.613742 Go to original source...
  15. Korean Statistical Information Service. (2023a). Statistics List. Retrieved from https://kosis.kr/eng/statisticsList/statisticsListIndex.do?menuId=M_01_01&vwcd=MT_ETITLE∥mTabId=M_01_01
  16. Liu, D.-C. (2021). The unemployment Invariance Hypothesis. Hitotsubashi Journal of Economics, 62(2), 178-199.
  17. Ludlow, J., Enders, W. (2000). Estimating non-linear ARMA models using Fourier coefficients. International Journal of Forecasting, 16(3), 333-347. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2070(00)00048-0 Go to original source...
  18. Nemore, F., Caferra, R., Morone, A. (2021). Unemployment and labor force participation in Italy. International Journal of Manpower, 42(8), 1440-1449. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-07-2020-0343 Go to original source...
  19. Nguyen Van, P. (2016). Examining the unemployment invariance hypothesis: the case of Australia. Australian Economic Review, 49(1), 54-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8462.12139 Go to original source...
  20. Österholm, P. (2010). Unemployment and labour-force participation in Sweden. Economics Letters, 106(3), 205-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2009.12.002 Go to original source...
  21. Oţoiu, A., Ţiţan, E. (2016). Does the unemployment invariance hypothesis hold for Romania. Applied Economics Letters, 23(12), 884-887. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2015.1117040 Go to original source...
  22. Pascalau, R., Lee, J., Nazlioglu, S., et al. (2022). Johansen-type cointegration tests with a Fourier function. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 43(5), 828-852. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsa.12640 Go to original source...
  23. Raifu, I. A., Adeboje, O. M. (2022). Labour force participation and unemployment rate: does discouraged-worker effect hypothesis or unemployment invariance hypothesis hold in Africa. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 13(2), 284-405. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEMS-07-2021-0317 Go to original source...
  24. Tansel, A., Ozdemir, Z. A., Aksoy, E. (2016a). Does the unemployment invariance hypothesis hold for Canada? IZA Discussion Paper No. 10178. Go to original source...
  25. Tansel, A., Ozdemir, Z. A., Aksoy, E. (2016b). Unemployment and labour force participation in Turkey. Applied Economics Letters, 23(3), 184-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2015.1064071 Go to original source...
  26. Yildirim, Z. (2014). The unemployment rate and labor force participation rate nexus for female: Evidence from Turkey. International Journal of Economics and Finance, 6(5), 139-147. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijef.v6n5p139 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.