D02 - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and ImpactNávrat zpět

Výsledky 1 až 4 z 4:

Dosahování a narušování institucionální rovnováhy v redistribučních systémech

Creation and Violation of Institutional Equilibrium in Redistribution Systems

Petr Wawrosz

Politická ekonomie 2011, 59(4):526-546 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.803

Institutional economics is one of the most developing fields of economics. However, many its issues still need to be solved. For instance the theory does not give exact answer to why particular institutions (formal and informal norms) occur, change and cease to exist. The paper tries to solve the topic through the model of establishing and disrupting institutional equilibrium in redistribution systems. People live their whole lives in redistribution systems and they can be members of a winning coalition and receive some redistribution or they are out of coalition and the redistribution is made to their detriment. The members of a winning coalition are not, however, automatically guaranteed ongoing membership. So they have interest to establish a structure of institutions (institutional equilibrium) helping them to protect their position. The paper divides redistribution into two kinds: necessary and unnecessary redistribution. The process of creating a winning coalition in a redistribution system is described and it is shown how institutions help to facilitate the process. Then the paper defines the institutional equilibrium (IEQ) and its conditions. They are explained the connections between IEQ and redistribution systems, the conditions when is convenient for some players endeavour to create a equilibrium, the reasons why IEQ does not occur. The theory of institutional change is hereto used - if somebody endeavours to create a IEQ, (s)he also realizes a institutional change.

Ekonomika daru, dar a jeho reflexe v ekonomické teorii

Gifts Economy and Its Reflection in Economics

František Svoboda

Politická ekonomie 2010, 58(1):105-129 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.722

This paper inquires into beginnings of a gift economy as well as related contemporary institutions. Gift economy and the gift as a complex phenomenon was a common base for institutions of markets, credits, taxation, alms or social security. Inquires of origins, development and contemporary forms are consequently important contributions to our understanding to contemporary social institutions. We can also inquire with economists into present forms of a gift and look for reply to different questions about efficiency of a gift: Why to give, how to give and what way give a gift.

Za obzor neoklasické ekonomie: cesta k principům nové institucionální ekonomie

Beyond the horizon of neoclassical economics: navigation to principles of the new institutional economics

František Svoboda

Politická ekonomie 2007, 55(4):539-557 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.613

This paper starts with discussion about enhanced and frequently used conceptions of free markets, market failures and market primacy. There are pointed some simplifications due to the man should be prospective while using them, especially in applied economics. We have no positive definition of a free market and it is not clear, how often and if any we can observe such market about us. Troubles with market failures are derived from different meanings in different schools of economic thought. The market primacy is an abstract concept more than historical fact. Because of such difficulties the paper is inscribed to institutional alternative which is able to evolve complex research of institutions and to involve useful aspects of neoclassical economics. Useful ground for this analysis is institutional individualism which defines program for research of institutional framework of economy.

Má důchodová reforma se zadlužením smysl?

Has pension reform with indebtedness a sense?

Marek Loužek

Politická ekonomie 2006, 54(2):247-260 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.556

The paper is concerned with pension reform in the Czech Republic and abroad. It argues against two opinions: on the one hand, that it is not necessary to do anything, and on the other hand, that a mandatory funded system should be implemented. Both approaches are false, because of creating overwhelming explicit debts. The author recommends an evolutionary approach founded upon decreasing of PAYG in combination with voluntary savings.