Politická ekonomie X:X | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.1482

Impact of Big Four Audit Firms on Environmental Disclosure in China: Critical Role of Governance and Ownership Structure

Chen Liu, Lei Zhou, Nabiha Jamil, Najaf Iqbal, Wenzhu Ji, Irum Shahzadi
Chen Liu, School of Accounting, Wuhan College, Wuhan Hubei, China
Lei Zhou, School of Accounting, Wuhan College, Wuhan Hubei, China
Nabiha Jamil, GIFT University, Gujranwala, Pakistan
Najaf Iqbal (corresponding author), School of Accounting, Hubei University of Economics, China
Wenzhu Ji, Business School, Shandong Yingcai University, China
Irum Shahzadi, Advanced Research Centre, European University of Lefke, Lefke, Northern Cyprus, Mersin, Turkey, Széchenyi István University, Faculty of Economics, Győr, Hungary

As the corporate world has recently been increasingly held accountable for its non-green behaviour, corporate environmental disclosures (CED) are crucial in informing the relevant stakeholders. Among the factors influencing CED, firm auditors play a pivotal role. Our research investigates the impact of Big Four audit firms on corporate environmental disclosure in China. With unique institutional factors and the most significant carbon emissions globally, China provides an exciting and compelling ground for studying this relationship. For this purpose, we use annual firm-level data of A-listed shares on the Shenzhen and Shanghai stock exchanges and employ the Poisson and negative binomial regression models for empirical analyses. Contrary to the common belief that Big Four audit firms lead to improved disclosure quality, we find that they negatively affect environmental disclosure in China. We also investigate the moderating role of corporate governance and ownership structure in this relationship. A high ratio of state ownership, male directors on the board and institutional investor holding worsen the disclosure quality. However, a high ratio of independent directors mitigates this issue. These findings open new avenues for further research and can guide future policy decisions regarding environmental disclosure in Chinese firms. The Big Four audit firms should be more stringent in their operations and supervise public firms regarding environmental disclosures.

Keywords: Big Four audit firms, corporate environmental disclosure, China, corporate governance.

Received: June 30, 2024; Revised: December 9, 2024; Accepted: December 16, 2024; Prepublished online: July 8, 2025 

Download citation

References

  1. Adams, R. B., Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the Boardroom and Their Impact on Governance and Performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007 Go to original source...
  2. Bear, S., Rahman, N., Post, C. (2010). The impact of board diversity and gender composition on corporate social responsibility and firm reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(2), 207-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0505-2 Go to original source...
  3. Ben-Amar, W., McIlkenny, P. (2015). Board effectiveness and the voluntary disclosure of climate change information. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(8), 704-719. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1840 Go to original source...
  4. Khan, H. U. R., Khidmat, W. B., Al Hares, O., et al. (2022). How do independent directors view carbon information disclosure? Evidence from China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 853590. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.853590 Go to original source...
  5. Cormier, D., Ledoux, M. J., Magnan, M. (2011). The informational contribution of social and environmental disclosures for investors. Management Decision, 49(8), 1276-1304. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251741111163124 Go to original source...
  6. Cucari, N., Esposito De Falco, S., Orlando, B. (2018). Diversity of board of directors and environmental social governance: Evidence from Italian listed companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(3), 250-266. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1452 Go to original source...
  7. Cumming, D., Leung, T. Y., Rui, O. (2015). Gender diversity and securities fraud. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1572-1593. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0750 Go to original source...
  8. DeFond, M. L., Zhang, J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2-3), 275-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2014.09.002 Go to original source...
  9. Du, X. (2016). Does Confucianism reduce board gender diversity? Firm-level evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(2), 399-436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2508-x Go to original source...
  10. Fama, E. F., Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325. https://doi.org/10.1086/467037 Go to original source...
  11. Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., Ruiz, S. (2014). Commitment to corporate social responsibility measured through global reporting initiative reporting: Factors affecting the behavior of companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 81, 244-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.06.034 Go to original source...
  12. Freeman, R. E. (2010). The stakeholder approach. In: Freeman, R. E. Strategic management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139192675.003 Go to original source...
  13. Galbreath, J. (2011). Are there gender-related influences on corporate sustainability? A study of women on boards of directors. Journal of Management & Organization, 17(1), 17-38. https://doi.org/10.5172/jmo.2011.17.1.17 Go to original source...
  14. García-Sánchez, I. M., Martínez-Ferrero, J. (2017). Independent directors and CSR disclosure: The moderating effect of proprietary costs. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(2), 83-97. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1389 Go to original source...
  15. Ge, J., Zhao, W. (2017). Institutional linkages with the state and organizational practices in corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China. Management and Organization Review, 13(3), 539-573. https://doi.org/10.1017/mor.2016.56 Go to original source...
  16. Grosvold, J., Brammer, S. (2011). National Institutional Systems as Antecedents of Female Board Representation: An Empirical Study. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19(2), 116-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00848.x Go to original source...
  17. Gul, F. A., Srinidhi, B., Ng, A. C. (2011). Does board gender diversity improve the informativeness of stock prices? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 51(3), 314-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.01.005 Go to original source...
  18. Haniffa, R. M., Cooke, T. E. (2005). The impact of culture and governance on corporate social reporting. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 24(5), 391-430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2005.06.001 Go to original source...
  19. Hillman, A. J., Dalziel, T. (2003). Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 383-396. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2003.10196729 Go to original source...
  20. Ho, S. S., Wong, K. S. (2001). A study of the relationship between corporate governance structures and the extent of voluntary disclosure. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 10(2), 139-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1061-9518(01)00041-6 Go to original source...
  21. Iqbal, N., Xu, J. F., Fareed, Z., et al. (2022). Financial leverage and corporate innovation in Chinese public-listed firms, European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(1), 299-323. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2020-0161 Go to original source...
  22. Jiraporn, P., Gleason, K. C. (2007). Capital structure, shareholder rights, and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Research, 30(1), 21-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6803.2007.00200.x Go to original source...
  23. Khidmat, W. B., Habib, M. D., Awan, S., et al. (2022). Female directors on corporate boards and their impact on corporate social responsibility (CSR): Evidence from China. Management Research Review, 45(4), 563-595. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-09-2020-0560 Go to original source...
  24. Li, Q., Ruan, W., Li, R., et al. (2023). Do institutional investors' holdings affect corporate environmental information disclosure? Evidence from China. Environment Development and Sustainability, 25, 14733-14751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02686-9 Go to original source...
  25. Li, W., Zhang, R. (2010). Corporate social responsibility, ownership structure, and political interference: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(4), 631-645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0488-z Go to original source...
  26. Marquis, C., Qian, C. (2014). Corporate social responsibility reporting in China: Symbol or substance? Organization Science, 25(1), 127-148. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0837 Go to original source...
  27. McElduff, F. (2008). Negative Binomial Regression. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 171(3), 758-759. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2008.00538_6.x Go to original source...
  28. Michelon, G., Parbonetti, A. (2012). The effect of corporate governance on sustainability disclosure. Journal of Management & Governance, 16(3), 477-509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-010-9160-3 Go to original source...
  29. Prado-Lorenzo, J. M., Garcia-Sanchez, I. M. (2010). The role of the board of directors in disseminating relevant information on greenhouse gases. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(3), 391-424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0515-0 Go to original source...
  30. Rao, K., Tilt, C. (2016). Board composition and corporate social responsibility: The role of diversity, gender, strategy and decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 138(2), 327-347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2613-5 Go to original source...
  31. Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A., Chua, W. F. (2009). Assurance on sustainability reports: An international comparison. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 937-967. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.3.937 Go to original source...
  32. Shang, Y., Chi, Y. (2023). Corporate environmental information disclosure and earnings management in China: Ethical behaviour or opportunism motivation? Sustainability, 15(11), https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118896 Go to original source...
  33. Srinidhi, B., Gul, F. A., Tsui, J. (2011). Female directors and earnings quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(5), 1610-1644. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01071.x Go to original source...
  34. Stoklosa, J., Blakey, R. V., Hui, F. K. C. (2022). An Overview of Modern Applications of Negative Binomial Modelling in Ecology and Biodiversity. Diversity, 14(5), 320. https://doi.org/10.3390/d14050320 Go to original source...
  35. Sun, N., Salama, A., Hussainey, K., et al. (2010). Corporate environmental disclosure, corporate governance and earnings management. Managerial Auditing Journal, 25(7), 679-700. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686901011061351 Go to original source...
  36. Tang, Y., Xu, H. (2021). Incentives for corporate environmental information disclosure in China: Public media pressure, local government supervision and interactive effects. Sustainability, 13(18), 10016. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810016 Go to original source...
  37. Wang, J., Ke, Y., Zhang, H., et al. (2023). Which institutional investors can improve the level of corporate ESG information disclosure? PLoS ONE, 18(11), e0290008. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290008 Go to original source...
  38. Zeng, S. X., Xu, X. D., Yin, H. T., et al. (2012). Factors that drive Chinese listed companies in voluntary disclosure of environmental information. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(3), 309-321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-1129-x Go to original source...
  39. Zahid, R. A., Saleem, A., Maqsood, U. S. (2023). ESG performance, capital financing decisions, and audit quality: empirical evidence from Chinese state-owned enterprises. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(15), 44086-44099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25345-6 Go to original source...
  40. Zhang, Y., Qu, H. (2021). The impact of independent directors on corporate environmental performance: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 280, 124372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124372 Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.