Politická ekonomie X:X | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.1481

The Importance of Social Government Expenditures for Income Inequality in EU Countries

Karina Zhemelko ORCID..., Nikola Šubová ORCID...
Karina Zhemelko, Technical university of Kosice, Faculty of Economics, Kosice, Slovakia
Nikola Šubová (corresponding author), Technical university of Kosice, Faculty of Economics, Kosice, Slovakia

The issue of growing income inequality has become a central focus in global economic policy debates. This paper examines the impact of social government spending on income inequality in the 27 Member States of the European Union between 2010 and 2020, utilizing regression analysis of panel data. The findings indicate that the level of social government spending reflects the varying fiscal policies on social protection across EU countries, with the largest share allocated to old age expenditure. However, the analysis reveals that old age government expenditure does not have a statistically significant impact on income inequality. In contrast, increased spending on unemployment benefits, and support for families and children, is associated with a reduction in income inequality. These results underscore the need to address structural disparities and provide targeted unemployment and family support to ensure adequate living conditions for vulnerable groups.

Keywords: Income inequality, S80/S20 index, Gini coefficient, social government spending, panel analysis

Vloženo: 12. leden 2024; Revidováno: 10. prosinec 2024; Přijato: 11. prosinec 2024; Zveřejněno online: 28. září 2025 

Stáhnout citaci
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Zobrazit celý článek

    Reference

    1. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. and Robinson, J.A. (2001). The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 91, 1369-1401. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.5.1369. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    2. Aiyar, S., Ebeke, Ch. (2020). Inequality of opportunity, inequality of income and economic growth. World Development, 136, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105115. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    3. Alamanda, A. (2020). The effect of government expenditure on income inequality and poverty in Indonesia. Info Artha, 4(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.31092/jia.v4i1.614. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    4. Almeida, V., Barrios, S., Christl, M., De Poli, S., Tumino, A., van der Wielen, W. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on households´ income in the EU. The Journal of Economic Inequality. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-021-09485-8. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    5. Anderson, E., D'Orey, M. A. J., Duvendack, M., & Esposito, L. (2015). The impact of government policies on income inequality and the translation of growth into income poverty reduction: protocol for two systematic reviews. Journal of Development Effectiveness, 7(4), 484-498. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12173. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    6. Anderson, E., D´Orey, M. A. J., Duvendack, M., Esposito, L. (2016). Does government spending affect income inequality? A meta-regression analysis. Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(4), 961-987. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12173. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    7. Antonelli, M. A., De Bonis, V. (2018). The efficiency of social public expenditure in European countries: a two-stage analysis. Applied Economics, (), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2018.1489522. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    8. Atkinson, A. B. (1997). Bringing income distribution in from the cold. The Economic Journal, 107(441), 297-321. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0013-0133.1997.159.x. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    9. Barro, R., (2008). Inequality and growth revisited. Asian Development Bank: Working Paper Series on Regional Economic Integration No. 14.
    10. Bastagli, F., Coady, D. Gupta, S. (2012). Income inequality and fiscal policy. IMF Staff Discussion Note No: SDN/12/08. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    11. Benos, N., Karagiannis, S. (2017). Inequality and growth in the United States: Why physical and human capital matter. Economic Inquiry, 56(1), 572-619. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12475 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    12. Biegert, T. (2017). Welfare benefits and unemployment in affluent democracies: The moderating role of the institutional insider/outsider divide. American Sociological Review, 82(5), 1037-1064. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122417727095. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    13. Blázquez-Fernández, C., Cantarero-Prieto, D., Pascual-Saez, M. (2018). Does Rising Income Inequality Reduce Life Expectancy? New Evidence for 26 European Countries (1995-2014). Global Economic Review, (), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1226508X.2018.1526098. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    14. Bor, J., Cohen, G.H., Galea, S. (2017). Population health in an era of rising income inequality: USA, 1980-2015. Lancet, 389(10077),1475-1490. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30571-8. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    15. Borjas, G.J., Freeman, R.B., Katz, L.F. (1992). On the Labor Market Effects of Immigration and Trade. In Immigration and the Workforce, edited by G. J. Borjas, and R. B. Freeman, 213-44. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    16. Broom, D. (2019). Why Nordic nations are the best places to have children, 2019 [online]. World Economic Forum [cit. 16.04.2024]. Available on: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2019/03/nordic-nations-best-places-for-parents-children/.
    17. Callan, T., Doorley, K., Savage, M. (2018). Inequality in EU crisis countries: how effective were automatic stabilisers? IZA Discussion paper No.11439. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    18. Cammeraat, E. (2020). The relationship between different social expenditure schemes and poverty, inequality and economic growth. International Social Security Review, 73(2), 101- 123. https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.12236. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    19. Chetty, R. (2008). Moral hazard versus liquidity and optimal unemployment insurance. Journal of Political Economy, 116(2), 173-234. https://doi.org/10.1086/588585. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    20. Čok, M., Urban, I., Verbič, M. (2013). Income redistribution through taxes and social benefits: The case of Slovenia and Croatia. Panoeconomicus, 60, 667-686. https://doi.org/10.2298/PAN1305667C. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    21. Compton, M. T., Shim, R. S. (2015). Social determinants of mental health. Washington: American Psychiatric Publishing.
    22. Congressional Budget Office. (2022). The Distribution of Household Income, 2019 [online]. Congressional Budget Office, Nonpartisan Analysis for the U.S. Congress. [cit. 03.04.2024].
    23. D'Agostino, G., Pieroni, L., Scarlato, M. (2020). Social transfers and income inequality in OECD countries. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 52, 313-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2019.11.004. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    24. Deaton, A., Paxson, C. (1994). Intertemporal choice and inequality. Journal of Political Economy, 102(3), 437-467. https://doi.org/10.1086/261941. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    25. Dotti, V. (2020). Income inequality, size of government, and tax progressivity. European Economic Review, 121, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2019.103327. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    26. Duncan, D., Sabirianova, P.K. (2016). Unequal inequalities: Do progressive taxes reduce income inequality? International Tax and Public Finance, 23, 762-783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-016-9412-5. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    27. Ekkehard, E. (2015). Supporting jobseekers: How unemployment benefits can help unemployed workers and strengthen job creation. International Social Security Review, 68(3), 43-67. https://doi.org/10.1111/issr.12079 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    28. Elgar, F. J., Aitken, N. (2011). Income inequality, trust and homicide in 33 countries. European Journal of Public Health, 21(2), 241-246. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckq068. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    29. EU countries. TalTech Journal of European Studies, 9(1), 157-175. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2019-0009. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    30. European Commission. (2024a). General government expenditure by function (COFOG), 2024 [online]. Luxembourg: European Commission [cit. 11.04.2024]. Available on: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/gov_10a_exp__custom_10819096/default/table?lang=en.
    31. European Commission. (2024b). Persons at risk of poverty or social exclusion by income quantile and household composition - EU 2020 strategy, 2024 [online]. Luxembourg: European Commission [cit. 11.04.2024]. Available on: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/ilc_peps03__custom_10825244/default/table?lang=en.
    32. Eydam, U., Qualo, H. (2023). Income inequality and taxes - an empirical assessment. Applied Economics Letters, (2023), 1-8. doi:10.1080/13504851.2023.2208328. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    33. Farber, H. S., Rothstein, J., Valletta, R. G. (2015). The effect of extended unemployment insurance benefits: Evidence from 2012-2013 Phase-Out. American Economic Review, 105(5), 171-176. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20151088 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    34. Friedman, M., Kuznets, S. (1945). Income from Independent Professional Practice. National Bureau of Economic Research, New York.
    35. Frost, J., van Stralen, R. (2017). Macroprudential policy and income inequality. Journal of International Money and Finance, 85, 278-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2017.11.010. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    36. Garcia, K., Taheri Sanjani, M. (2022). Ireland selected issues. IMF Country Report, 22, 214. ISBN: 9798400213380.
    37. Giuliani, G. A. (2022). Welfare systems. Capitalisms and Democracies: Can Growth and Equality be Reconciled? 110-130. ISBN: 9781003297130. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    38. Guzi, M., Kahanec, M. (2018). Income Inequality and the Size of Government: A Causal Analysis. IZA Discussion Paper Series, No. 12015. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    39. Goh, L. T., Law, S. H. (2022). Deadly income inequality? A panel data analysis on the impact of income inequality on mental disorder mortality. International Journal of Business and Society, 23(3), 1499-1515. https://doi.org/10.33736/ijbs.5178.2022. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    40. Goni, E., Lopez, J.H., Serven, L. (2008). Fiscal redistribution and income inequality in Latin America. Policy Research Working Paper No. 4487. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    41. Granger, H., Abrahamovsky, L., Pudussery, J. (2022). Fiscal policy and income inequality. ODI Report. London: ODI. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    42. Greene, W. (2017). Econometric Analysis. Pearson, 8. ISBN: 9780134811932.
    43. Gupta, S. (2014). Fiscal Policy and Income Inequality. IMF Policy paper, 68.
    44. Higgins, M., Williamson, J.G. (1999). Explaining inequality the world round: Cohort size, Kuznets curves, and openness. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 7224, 57. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12337. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    45. Hwang, S., Choe, CH., Choi, K. (2021). Population ageing and income inequality. The Journal of the Economics of Ageing, 20, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeoa.2021.100345. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    46. International Monetary Fund (IMF). (2024). Income Inequality, Introduction to inequality, 2024 [online]. International Monetary Fund [cit. 11.04.2024]. Available on: https://www.imf.org/en/Topics/Inequality/introduction-to-inequality.
    47. Jackson, L.E., Otrok, CH., Owyang, M T. (209). Tax Progressivity, Economic Booms, and Trickle-Up Economics. St. Louis: Federal Reserve Bank. Working Paper 2019-034A.
    48. Ketkaew, C., Van Wouwe, M., Vichitthamaros, P., Teerawanviwat, D. (2019). The Effect of Expected Income on Wealth Accumulation and Retirement Contribution of Thai Wageworkers. SAGE Open, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019898247. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    49. Korzeniowska, A. M. (2021). Heterogeneity of government social spending in European Union countries. Future Business Journal, 7(38), 1-9. ttps://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-021-00084-7. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    50. Krieger, N., Williams, D. R., Moss, N. E. (1997). Measuring social class in US public health research: concepts, methodologies, and guidelines. Annual Review of Public Health, 18, 341-378. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.18.1.341. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    51. Kuznets, S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1-28.
    52. Layte, R., Whelan, C.T. (2014). Who Feels Inferior? A Test of the Status Anxiety Hypothesis of Social Inequalities in Health. European Sociological Review, 30(4), 525-535. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcu057. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    53. Lindert, P. (2021). Social spending and the welfare state. How Was Life? Volume II: New Perspectives on Well-being and Global Inequality since 1820. Paris: OECD Publishing.
    54. Lyubimov, I. (2017). Income inequality revisited 60 years later: Piketty vs Kuznets. Russian Journal of Economics, 3(1), 42-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ruje.2017.02.003. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    55. Maddala, G. S., Wu, S. (1999). A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(s1), 631-652. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1631. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    56. Manseau, M. W. (2015). Economic inequality, poverty and neighbourhood deprivation. In: Compton, M. T., Shim, R. S. (eds.) The social determinants of mental health. Washington: American Psychiatric Publishing. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    57. Martínez-Navarro, D., Amate-Fortes, I., Guarnido-Rueda, A. (2020) Inequality and development: is the Kuznets curve in effect today? Economia Politica, 37, 703-735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-020-00190-9. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    58. Mdingi, K., Ho, S.-Y. (2021). Literature review on income inequality and economic growth. MethodsX, 8, 101402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101402 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    59. Miežiené, R., Krutuliené, S. (2019). The impact of social transfers on poverty reduction in EU countries. TalTech Journal of European Studies, 9(1), 157-175. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2019-0009. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    60. Milanovic, B. (2016a) Income inequality is cyclical. Nature, 537, 479-482. https://doi.org/10.1038/537479a, Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    61. Milanovic, B. (2016b). Global Inequality. A New Approach for the Age of Globalization. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press. ISBN 9780674984035.
    62. Mill, J.S. (1848). Principles of Political Economy, Collected Works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
    63. Niyimbanira, F. (2017). Analysis of the Impact of Economic Growth on Income Inequality and Poverty in South Africa: The Case of Mpumalanga Province. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(4), 254-261. ISSN: 2146-4138.
    64. OECD (2023). The rise and fall of public social spending with the COVID-19 pandemic, 2023 [online]. Paris: OECD [cit. 16.4.2024]. Available on: https://www2.oecd.org/els/soc/OECD2023-Social-Expenditure-SOCX-Update-Rise-and-fall.pdf.
    65. Petrosky-Nadeau, N., Valletta, R. G. (2021). UI generosity and job acceptance: Effects of the 2020 CARES Act. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco Working Paper 2021-13. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    66. Pfaff, B. (2008). VAR, SVAR and SVEC models: Implementation within R package vars. Journal of statistical software, 27(4), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v027.i04. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    67. Pickett, K. E., James, O. W., Wilkinson, R. G. (2006). Income inequality and the prevalence of mental illness: A preliminary international analysis. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60(7), 646-647. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2006.046631. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    68. Piketty, T. (2013). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge (MA): The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
    69. Polacko, M. (2021). Causes and Consequences of Income Inequality - An Overview. Statistics, Politics and Policy, 12(2), 341-357. https://doi.org/10.1515/spp-2021-0017. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    70. Poterba. J. M. (2007). Income inequality and income taxation. Journal of Policy Modelling, 29(2007), 623-633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2007.05.010. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    71. Rabaté, S., Rochut, J. (2019). Employment and substitution effects of raising the statutory retirement age in France. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474747218000392. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    72. Rafferty, J. A., Abelson, J. M., Bryant, K., Jackson, J. S. (2015). Discrimination. In: Compton, M.T. and Shim, R.S. (ed.) The Social Determinants of Mental Health. Washington: American Psychiatric Publishing. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    73. Rattan, D. (2012). Exploring the Kuznets Curve and the "Latin American Effect" in Latin America. In K. Kulkarni (Ed.), International economic review: Post recession challenges & analyses (277-287). Daryaganj: Matrix Publishers.
    74. Rebollo-Sanz, Y. F., Rodríguez-Planas, N. (2020). When the going gets tough. Financial incentives, duration of unemployment, and job-match quality. Journal of Human Resources, 55(1), 119-163. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.55.1.1015.7420R2. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    75. Revenga, A. (1992). Exporting Jobs? The Impact of Import Competition on Employment and Wages in U.S. Manufacturing. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(1), 255-284. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118329. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    76. Rhee, C., Zhuang, J., Kanbur, R., & Felipe, J. (2014). Confronting Asia's rising inequality: Policy options. In R. Kanbur, C. Rhee, & J. Zhuang (Eds.), Inequality in Asia and the Pacific: Trends, drivers and policy implications. London: Routledge.
    77. Ricardo, D. (1817). On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, third ed. John Murray, London, 1821. The Works and Correspondence of David Ricardo. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
    78. Sánchez, A., Pérez-Corral, A. L. (2018). Government social expenditure and income inequalities in the European Union. Review of Public Economics, 227(4), 133-156. https://doi.org/10.7866/HPE-RPE.18.4.5. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    79. Savage, M., Callan, T., Nolan, B., Colgan, B. (2019). The Great Recession, austerity and inequality: lessons from Ireland. The review of income and wealth, 65(2), 312-336. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    80. Sidek, N. Z. M. (2021). Do government expenditure reduce income inequality: evidence from developing and developed countries. Studies in Economics and Finance, 38(2), 447-503. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEF-09-2020-0393. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    81. Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, ed. R.H. Campbell, A.S. Skinner and W.B. Todd. Oxford: Clarendon. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    82. Social Justice Ireland. (2023). Analysis and Critique of Budget 2023. Dublin, Ireland: Social Justice Ireland. ISSN: 1649-4954.
    83. Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). The price of inequality: How today's divided society endangers our future. USA: WW Norton & Company.
    84. Sundsbø, A., Sihvonen, E. (2018). Introduction: Parenting Support in the Nordic Countries: Is there a Specific Nordic Model? Social Policy and Society, 17(3), 425-429. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746417000604. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    85. Tibber, M.S., Walji, F., Kirkbirde, J.B.., Huddy, V. (2021). The association between income inequality and adult mental health at the subnational level-a systematic review. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 57(1), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00127-021-02159-w. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    86. Tiongson, E. R., Paternostro, S., Rajaram, A. (2007). How Does the Composition of Public Spending Matter? Oxford Development Studies, 35(1), 47-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600810601167595. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    87. Ulu, M. I. (2018). The effect of government social spending on income inequality in OECD: a panel data analysis. International Journal of Economics Politics Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(3), 1-19. ISSN: 2636-8137.
    88. United Nations (2024). Spending on social protection rose nearly 270% with pandemic, 2024 [online]. United Nations News [cit. 16.4.2021]. Available on: https://news.un.org/en/story/2022/02/1111442.
    89. Van Velthoven, A., De Haan, J., Sturm, J. E. (2018). Finance, income inequality and income redistribution. Applied Economics Letters, 26(14), 1202-1209. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2018.1542483 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    90. Wang, C., Wan, G., Luo, Z., Zhang, X. (2018), Aging and inequality: the link and transmission mechanisms. Review of Development Economics, 22(3), 885-903. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12394. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    91. Whittle, H. J., Palar, K., Ranadive, N. A., Turan, J. M., Kushel, M., Weiser, S. D. (2017). The land of the sick and the land of the healthy: disability, bureaucracy, and stigma among people living with poverty and chronic illness in the United States. Social Science & Medicine, 190, 181-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.08.031. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    92. Williams, D. R., Yu, Y., Jackson, J. S., Anderson, N. B. (1997). Racial differences in physical and mental health: Socio-economic status, stress and discrimination. Journal of Health Psychology, 2(3), 335-351. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910539700200305. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    93. Wu, X., Perloff, J. M., Golan, A. (2006). Effects of government policies on urban and rural income inequality. Review of Income and Wealth, 52(2), 213-235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4991.2006.00185.x Přejít k původnímu zdroji...

    Tento článek je publikován v režimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), která umožňuje nekomerční distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.


    Návrat zpět