Politická ekonomie 2025, 73(5) Special Issue II:868-890:868-890 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.1479

Mining-Ecological Footprint Nexus in the Global South: A Panel Data-Driven Approach

Abir Baita ORCID..., Burak Erkut ORCID..., Deniz İşçioğlu
Abir Baita, Eastern Mediterranean University, Faculty of Business and Economics, Gazimağusa, Northern Cyprus, Turkey
Burak Erkut (corresponding author), Eastern Mediterranean University, Faculty of Business and Economics, Gazimağusa, Northern Cyprus, Turkey
Deniz İşçioğlu, Eastern Mediterranean University, Faculty of Business and Economics, Gazimağusa, Northern Cyprus, Turkey

This research investigates the environmental effects of mining activities in countries in the Global South, specifically focusing on Brazil, China, India, Indonesia and Pakistan, from 1990 to 2020. Utilizing advanced econometric techniques, especially panel data methods, the study identifies considerable variations in how key factors - such as mineral rents, forest areas, GDP per capita and freshwater resources - affect the ecological footprint. The results support the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis and show that while mineral rents tend to decrease the ecological footprint, increased renewable freshwater resources are associated with a higher footprint (but the effect reverses in higher quantiles). No conclusive evidence can be found regarding the nexus between forest areas and the ecological footprint. By comparing the results with existing environmental standards and management practices, a significant gap between policy and practice is found, which contributes directly to the current environmental challenges and points out the need for country-specific strategies to increase environmental sustainability in the mining sector.

Keywords: Ecological footprint, environmental sustainability, mining activities, Global South
JEL classification: K32, O13, Q51

Vloženo: 30. červen 2024; Revidováno: 24. listopad 2024; Přijato: 9. prosinec 2024; Zveřejněno online: 8. červenec 2025; Zveřejněno: 29. říjen 2025  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Baita, A., Erkut, B., & İşçioğlu, D. (2025). Mining-Ecological Footprint Nexus in the Global South: A Panel Data-Driven Approach. Politická ekonomie, 73(Spec.issue II.), 868-890. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.1479
Stáhnout citaci
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Zobrazit celý článek

    Reference

    1. Ackers, B., & Grobbelaar, S. (2021). The impact of the integrated reporting framework on corporate social responsibility (CSR) disclosures - the case of South African mining companies. Social Responsibility Journal, 18(6), 1106-1127. https://doi.org/10.1108/srj-12-2020-0508 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    2. Alola, A., Adebayo, T., & Onifade, S. (2021). Examining the dynamics of ecological footprint in China with spectral Granger causality and quantile-on-quantile approaches. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 29(3), 263-276. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2021.1990158 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    3. Amoako, K. (2023). Stakeholders' perceptions of sustainability performance of a gold mining subsidiary in Ghana. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 20(3), 409-432. https://doi.org/10.1108/jaoc-08-2022-0119 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    4. Asmiani, N., Yusuf, F., Bakri, S., et al. (2023). The role of the mining and quarrying sector in the economic growth of Kolaka District, Southeast Sulawesi Province, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1134(1), 012026. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1134/1/012026 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    5. Asner, G., Llactayo, W., Tupayachi, R., et al. (2013). Elevated rates of gold mining in the Amazon revealed through high-resolution monitoring. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(46), 18454-18459. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1318271110 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    6. Bansal, C. L., & Aggarwal, S. (2017). Public policy paradox in enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in BRICS countries: A comparative analysis of legislative and judicial approach. International Journal of Law and Management, 59(6), 1279-1291. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    7. Biyase, M., Masron, T., Zwane, T., et al. (2023). Ecological footprint and population health outcomes: Evidence from E7 countries. Sustainability, 15(10), 8224. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108224 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    8. Chen, Q. (2023). The usage of spatial econometric approach to explore the determinants of ecological footprint in BRI countries. PLOS One, 18(10), e0288683. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288683 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    9. Chen, Y., & Chen, M. (2021). Ecological footprint, human capital, and urbanization. Energy & Environment, 33(3), 487-510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x211008610 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    10. Cooke, C., & Drevnick, P. (2022). Transboundary atmospheric pollution from mountaintop coal mining. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 9(11), 943-948. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00677 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    11. Cowan, M. (2024). Movement ecology of an endangered mesopredator in a mining landscape. Movement Ecology, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40462-023-00439-5 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    12. Devenin, V., & Bianchi, C. (2018). Soccer fields? What for? Effectiveness of corporate social responsibility initiatives in the mining industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 866-879. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1503 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    13. Deng, C., Liu, Z., Li, R., et al. (2018). Sustainability evaluation based on a three-dimensional ecological footprint model: A case study in Hunan, China. Sustainability, 10(12), 4498. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124498 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    14. Dong, S., & Xu, L. (2016). The impact of explicit CSR regulation: Evidence from China's mining firms. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 17(2), 237-258. https://doi.org/10.1108/jaar-03-2014-0030 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    15. Espejo, J., Messinger, M., Román-Dañobeytia, F., et al. (2018). Deforestation and forest degradation due to gold mining in the Peruvian Amazon: A 34-year perspective. Remote Sensing, 10(12), 1903. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs10121903 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    16. Erkut, B. (2022). Renewable Energy and Carbon Emissions: New Empirical Evidence from the Union for the Mediterranean. Sustainability, 14(11), 6921. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14116921 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    17. Fragkoulis, D., & Koemtzi, M. (2023). Corporate social responsibility in the Greek mining and quarrying companies. International Conference on Business and Economics - Hellenic Open University: ICBE-HOU Proceedings 2021, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.12681/icbe-hou.5311 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    18. Gabrielyan, A., Shahnazaryan, G., & Minasyan, S. (2018). Distribution and identification of sources of heavy metals in the Voghji River Basin impacted by mining activities (Armenia). Journal of Chemistry, Special Issue 2018, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7172426 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    19. Global Footprint Network (2024). National Footprint and Biocapacity Accounts. [Retrieved 2024-03-30] Available at: https://data.footprintnetwork.org
    20. Guo, J. (2022). Evaluation and prediction of ecological sustainability in the upper reaches of the Yellow River based on improved three-dimensional ecological footprint model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(20), 13550. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013550 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    21. He, M. (2023). Ecological effect life cycle assessment of house buildings based on emergy footprint model. Scientific Reports, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-43501-3 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    22. He, Y., Wang, S., & Chen, N. (2024). Mineral rents, natural resources depletion, and ecological footprint nexus in high emitting countries: Panel GLM analysis. Resources Policy, 89, 104472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.104472 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    23. Hudson-Edwards, K. (2018). Mining and planetary health: A geohealth-led special collection. Geohealth, 2(10), 278-282. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018gh000156 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    24. Jorgenson, A. (2003). Consumption and environmental degradation: A cross-national analysis of the ecological footprint. Social Problems, 50(3), 374-394. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2003.50.3.374 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    25. Kayani, U. N., Nasim, I., Aysan, A. F., et al. (2024). Emerging trends of carbon emissions and foreign direct investment: accounting for ecological footprints, renewable energy, globalization, and technological innovations in BRICS. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31, 41586-41599. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31495-4 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    26. Kaur, S., Aggarwal, S., & Sarwar, S. (2023). Trade balance, monetary supply, commodity prices, and greener energy growth: contextual evidence from BRICS economies in the lens of sustainability. Environmental Science & Pollution Research, 30, 73928-73940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-27475-3 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    27. Kirisci, M., & Demirhan, E. (2019). Resource wealth as leverage: Natural resources and the failure of non-violent campaigns. Government and Opposition, 56(1), 102-120. https://doi.org/10.1017/gov.2019.10 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    28. Kok, J., Parteli, E., Michaels, T., et al. (2012). The physics of wind-blown sand and dust. Reports on Progress in Physics, 75(10), 106901. https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/75/10/106901 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    29. Kubiszewski, I., Costanza, R., Franco, C., et al. (2013). Beyond GDP: Measuring and achieving global genuine progress. Ecological Economics, 93, 57-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.019 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    30. Lawer, E., Mupepele, A., & Klein, A. (2020). Artisanal mining impacts small mammals while chainsaw milling is a more sustainable practice in Ghana. Biodiversity and Conservation, 30(2), 295-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-020-02089-0 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    31. Li, R. (2024). Reexamining the impact of natural resource rent and corruption control on environmental quality: Evidence from carbon emissions and ecological footprint in 152 countries. Natural Resources Forum, 48(2), 636-660. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12391 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    32. Li, Y., Danwana, S., & Issahaku, F. (2022). Achieving environmental sustainability in Africa: The role of renewable energy consumption, natural resources, and government effectiveness-Evidence from symmetric and asymmetric ARDL models. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(13), 8038. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19138038 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    33. Lin, D., Hanscom, L., Murthy, A., et al. (2018). Ecological footprint accounting for countries: Updates and results of the National Footprint Accounts, 2012-2018. Resources, 7(3), 58. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources7030058 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    34. Matebesi, S., & Twala, C. (2023). Evolution of mining company responses to civil society mobilization in South Africa. Enterprise & Society, 25(2), 358-375. https://doi.org/10.1017/eso.2023.23 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    35. Muthoni, K. (2014). Biodiversity in fragmented key resource areas: persistence of plant diversity and productivity in an intensely grazed key resource area. Twente. PhD Thesis. University of Twente, Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC). Supervisor Andrew Skidmore. https://doi.org/10.3990/1.9789036537742 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    36. Pourebrahim, S., Hadipour, M., Emlaei, Z., et al. (2023). Analysis of environmental carrying capacity based on the ecological footprint for the sustainable development of Alborz, Iran. Sustainability, 15(10), 7935. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107935 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    37. Rainham, D., Cantwell, R., & Jason, T. (2013). Nature appropriation and associations with population health in Canada's largest cities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(4), 1268-1283. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10041268 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    38. Ruppen, D., Chituri, O., Meck, M., et al. (2021). Community-based monitoring detects sources and risks of mining-related water pollution in Zimbabwe. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.754540 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    39. Sahoo, M., & Sethi, N. (2021). The dynamic impact of urbanization, structural transformation, and technological innovation on ecological footprint and PM2.5: Evidence from newly industrialized countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(3), 4244-4277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01614-7 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    40. Sharif, A., Bariş-Tüzemen, Ö., Uzuner, G., et al. (2020). Revisiting the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on Turkey's ecological footprint: Evidence from quantile ARDL approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 57, 102138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102138 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    41. Sharma, G. D., Tiwari, A. K., Erkut, B., et al. (2021). Exploring the nexus between non-renewable and renewable energy consumptions and economic development: Evidence from panel estimations. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 146, 111152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111152 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    42. Shut'ko, L., Samorodova, L., & Ivanov, A. (2020). Ecological footprint and decoupling i n the sustainable development of a region. E3S Web of Conferences, 174, 04058. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202017404058 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    43. Sonter, L., Herrera, D., Barrett, D., et al. (2017). Mining drives extensive deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Nature Communications, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00557-w Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    44. Sternberg, T., & Edwards, M. (2017). Desert dust and Health: A Central Asian Review and steppe case study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(11), 1342. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14111342 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    45. Šatrović, E., & Adedoyin, F. (2022). An empirical assessment of electricity consumption and environmental degradation in the presence of economic complexities. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(52), 78330-78344. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21099-9 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    46. Sofuoğlu, E., & Kirikkaleli, D. (2023). The effect of mineral saving and energy on the ecological footprint in an emerging market: Evidence from novel Fourier-based approaches. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12076-023-00328-w Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    47. Tampushi, L., Onyari, J., & Muthama, N. (2021). A review of mining regulations and environmental sustainability of artisanal gold mining sector. Asian Journal of Environment & Ecology, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajee/2021/v16i430253 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    48. Tinov, M., Mulyadi, A., Putra, A., et al. (2022). Measuring cross-sector collaboration an effective solution for solving unlicensed mining problems in Kuantan Singingi, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1041(1), 012050. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1041/1/012050 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    49. Ullah, A., Ahmed, M., Raza, S., et al. (2021). A threshold approach to sustainable development: Nonlinear relationship between renewable energy consumption, natural resource rent, and ecological footprint. Journal of Environmental Management, 295, 113073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113073 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    50. Ulucak, R., & Khan, S. (2020). Determinants of the ecological footprint: Role of renewable energy, natural resources, and urbanization. Sustainable Cities and Society, 54, 101996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101996 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    51. Venetoulis, J., & Talberth, J. (2007). Refining the ecological footprint. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 10(4), 441-469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-006-9074-z Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    52. Wang, Y. (2024). Comparison and prediction of the ecological footprint of water resources in the nine cities and states of Guizhou Province. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4160267/v1 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    53. WB (2024). World Development Indicators. [Retrieved 2024-03-30] Available at: https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators
    54. Xue, L., Haseeb, M., Mahmood, H., et al. (2021). Renewable energy use and ecological footprints mitigation: Evidence from selected South Asian economies. Sustainability, 13(4), 1613. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041613 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    55. Yasin, I., Ahmad, N., Amin, S., et al. (2024). Does agriculture, forests, and energy consumption foster the carbon emissions and ecological footprint? fresh evidence from BRICS economies. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04456-7 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    56. Yoon, H., & Yoon, J. (2022). The impact of acid mine drainage on zebrafish (Danio rerio) and water fleas (Daphnia magna) near the Geum River Basin in Korea. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(24), 16470. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192416470 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    57. Zhang, L., Yang, B., & Jahanger, A. (2021). The role of remittance inflow and renewable and non-renewable energy consumption in the environment: Accounting ecological footprint indicator for top remittance-receiving countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(11), 15915-15930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16545-z Přejít k původnímu zdroji...

    Tento článek je publikován v režimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), která umožňuje nekomerční distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.


    Zpět na obsah