Politická ekonomie 2024, Volume 72(2), Special Issue: 151-180 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.1413

Effect of Political Stability, Geopolitical Risk and R&D Investments on Environmental Sustainability: Evidence from European Countries by Novel Quantile Models

Serpil Kiliç Depren ORCID..., Sinan Erdogan ORCID..., Mustafa Tevfik Kartal ORCID..., Ugur Korkut Pata ORCID...
Serpil Kiliç Depren: Yildiz Technical University Department of Statistics, Istanbul, Turkey
Sinan Erdogan: Hatay Mustafa Kemal University Department of Economics, Hatay, Turkey; Azerbaijan State University of Economics (UNEC) Clinic of Economics, Baku, Azerbaijan
Mustafa Tevfik Kartal: Borsa Istanbul Strategic Planning, Financial Reporting, and Investor Relations Directorate, Istanbul, Turkey; Lebanese American University Adnan Kassar School of Business, Beirut/Lebanon; Azerbaijan State University of Economics (UNEC) Clinic of Economics, Baku, Azerbaijan
Ugur Korkut Pata (corresponding author): Osmaniye Korkut Ata University Department of Economics, Osmaniye, Turkey; Lebanese American University Adnan Kassar School of Business, Beirut, Lebanon; Azerbaijan State University of Economics (UNEC) Clinic of Economics, Baku, Azerbaijan

This research investigates the effect of political stability and geopolitical risk on environmental sustainability (ES) by considering R&D investments in nuclear and renewable energy. Con- sidering the high political stability and recent energy crisis and increasing geopolitical risk, the study focuses on three leading European countries. We use the load capacity factor, include data between 1985/1 and 2020/12, and apply quantile on quantile regression (QQ), Granger causality in quantiles (GQ), and quantile regression (QR) models. The study finds that in higher quantiles (i) increasing political stability stimulates the ES in Sweden and the United Kingdom; (ii) increasing geopolitical risk supports the ES in France; (iii) R&D investments increase the ES in all the countries; (iv) there are generally causal effects from the explanatory variables to the ES except some quantiles (0.45-0.50) in all the countries; (v) the power effects of the variables differ according to countries, quantiles and variables.

Keywords: Load capacity factor, political stability, geopolitical risk, European countries, environmental sustainability
JEL classification: C32, N55, O13

Vloženo: 14. červenec 2023; Revidováno: 19. srpen 2023; Přijato: 26. září 2023; Zveřejněno online: 22. listopad 2023; Zveřejněno: 1. květen 2024  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kiliç Depren, S., Erdogan, S., Tevfik Kartal, M., & Pata, U.K. (2024). Effect of Political Stability, Geopolitical Risk and R&D Investments on Environmental Sustainability: Evidence from European Countries by Novel Quantile Models. Politická ekonomie, 72(Spec.issue), 151-180. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.1413
Stáhnout citaci
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Zobrazit celý článek

    Reference

    1. Abid, M. (2016). Impact of economic, financial, and institutional factors on CO2 emissions: Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa economies. Utilities Policy, 41, 85-94, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2016.06.009 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    2. Acaravci, A., Erdogan, S. (2017). The Relationship between institutional structure and economic growth: A comparative analysis for selected countries. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(6), 141.
    3. Adebayo, T. S. (2022). Renewable energy consumption and environmental sustainability in Canada: Does political stability make a difference? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(21), 61307-61322, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20008-4 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    4. Adebayo, T. S., Ağa, M., Kartal, M. T. (2023). Analyzing the co-movement between CO2 emissions and disaggregated nonrenewable and renewable energy consumption in BRICS: Evidence through the lens of wavelet coherence. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(13), 38921-38938, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24707-w Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    5. Ahmad, M., Ahmed, Z., Khan, S. A., et al. (2023). Towards environmental sustainability in E-7 countries: Assessing the roles of natural resources, economic growth, country risk, and energy transition. Resources Policy, 82, 103486, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103486 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    6. Ahmad, M., Ahmed, Z., Riaz, M., et al. (2023). Modeling the linkage between climate-tech, energy transition, and CO2 emissions: Do environmental regulations matter? Gondwana Research, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.04.003 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    7. Agboola, M. O., Bekun, F. V. (2019). Does agricultural value added induce environmental degradation? Empirical evidence from an agrarian country. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(27), 27660-27676, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05943-z Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    8. Akhayere, E., Kartal, M. T., Adebayo, T. S., et al. (2023). Role of energy consumption and trade openness towards environmental sustainability in Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(8), 21156-21168, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23639-9 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    9. Ali, U., Li, Y., Wang, J. J., et al. (2021). Dynamics of outward FDI and productivity spillovers in logistics services industry: Evidence from China. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 148, 102258, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102258 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    10. Al-Mulali, U., Öztürk, İ. (2015). The effect of energy consumption, urbanization, trade openness, industrial output, and the political stability on the environmental degradation in the MENA (Middle East and North African) region. Energy, 84, 382-389, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2015.03.004 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    11. Anser, M. K., Syed, Q. R., Apergis, N. (2021). Does geopolitical risk escalate CO2 emissions? Evidence from the BRICS countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(35), 48011-48021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14032-z Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    12. Anser, M. K., Syed, Q. R., Lean, H. H., et al. (2021). Do economic policy uncertainty and geopolitical risk lead to environmental degradation? Evidence from emerging economies. Sustainability, 13(11), 5866, https://doi.org/10.3390/su13115866 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    13. Ambec, S., Lanoie, P. (2008). Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(4), 45-62. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    14. Apergis, N., Öztürk, İ. (2015). Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Asian countries. Ecological Indicators, 52, 16-22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.11.026 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    15. Awosusi, A. A., Akadiri, S. S., Olanrewaju, V. O., et al. (2023). The role of energy, political stability, and real income on achieving carbon neutrality: Asymmetric evidence. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30, 83302-83318, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28136-1 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    16. Ayhan, F., Kartal, M. T., Kiliç Depren, S., et al. (2023). Asymmetric effect of economic policy uncertainty, political stability, energy consumption, and economic growth on CO2 emissions: Evidence from G-7 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(16), 47422-47437, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25665-7 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    17. Baba Ali, E., Radmehr, R., Shayanmehr, S., et al. (2023). The role of technology innovation, R&D, and quality governance in pollution mitigation for EU economies: Fresh evidence from method of moment quantile regression. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 30(3), 244-261, https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2022.2134939 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    18. Balcilar, M., Gupta, R., Pierdzioch, C. (2016). Does uncertainty move the gold price? New evidence from a nonparametric causality-in-quantiles test. Resources Policy, 49, 74-80, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2016.04.004 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    19. Bildirici, M. (2022). The impacts of governance on environmental pollution in some countries of Middle East and sub-Saharan Africa: The evidence from panel quantile regression and causality. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(12), 17382-17393, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15716-2 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    20. Bilgili, F., Nathaniel, S. P., Kuşkaya, S., et al. (2021). Environmental pollution and energy research and development: An Environmental Kuznets Curve model through quantile simulation approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(38), 53712-53727, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14506-0 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    21. Broock, W. A., Scheinkman, J. A., Dechert, W. D., et al. (1996). A test for independence based on the correlation dimension. Econometric Reviews, 15(3), 197-235, https://doi.org/10.1080/07474939608800353 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    22. Chen, L., Li, K., Chen, S., et al. (2021). Industrial activity, energy structure, and environmental pollution in China. Energy Economics, 104, 105633, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105633 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    23. Dai, J., Ahmed, Z., Pata, U. K., et al. (2023). Achieving SDG-13 in the era of conflicts: The roles of economic growth and government stability. Evaluation Review, https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841X231160626 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    24. Du, Y., Wang, W. (2023). The role of green financing, agriculture development, geopolitical risk, and natural resource on environmental pollution in China. Resources Policy, 82, 103440, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103440 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    25. Erdogan, S., Adedoyin, F. F., Bekun, F. V., et al. (2020). Testing the transport-induced environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: The role of air and railway transport. Journal of Air Transport Management, 89, 101935, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jairtraman.2020.101935 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    26. Erdogan, S., Sarkodie, S. A., Adedoyin, F. F., et al. (2022). Analyzing transport demand and environmental degradation: The case of G-7 countries. Environment, Development and Sustainability, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02729-1 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    27. Farooq, U., Gillani, S., Subhani, B. H., et al. (2023). Economic policy uncertainty and environmental degradation: The moderating role of political stability. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(7), 18785-18797, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23479-7 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    28. GFN (2023). Country trends. [Retrieved on 2023-06-16] Available at: https://data.footprintnetwork.org/?_ga=2.213014356.193975080.1607636931-1228825067.1607467693#/countryTrends?type=BCtot,EFCtot&cn=68
    29. Grossman, G. M., Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. NBER Working Paper No. 3914, https://doi.org/10.3386/w3914 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    30. Hashmi, S. M., Bhowmik, R., Inglesi-Lotz, R., et al. (2022). Investigating the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis amidst geopolitical risk: Global evidence using bootstrap ARDL approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(16), 24049-24062, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17488-1 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    31. He, J. (2006). Pollution haven hypothesis and environmental impacts of foreign direct investment: The case of industrial emission of sulfur dioxide (SO2) in Chinese provinces. Ecological Economics, 60(1), 228-245. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    32. Iacoviello, M. (2023). Geopolitical Risk Index. [Retrieved 2023-07-13] Available at: www.matteoiacoviello.com/gpr.htm
    33. IEA (2023a). Coal. [Retrieved on 2023-06-13] Available at: https://www.iea.org/energy-system/fossil-fuels/coal
    34. IEA (2023b). Energy Technology RD&D Budgets. [Retrieved on 2023-06-16] Available at: https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-product/energy-technology-rd-and-d-budget-database-2
    35. Jiang, S., Chishti, M. Z., Rjoub, H., et al. (2022). Environmental R&D and trade-adjusted carbon emissions: Evaluating the role of international trade. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(42), 63155-63170, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-20003-9 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    36. Jin, X., Ahmed, Z., Pata, U. K., et al. (2023). Do investments in green energy, energy efficiency, and nuclear energy R&D improve the load capacity factor? An augmented ARDL approach. Geoscience Frontiers, 101646, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2023.101646 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    37. Kartal, M. T. (2022). The role of consumption of energy, fossil sources, nuclear energy, and renewable energy on environmental degradation in top-five carbon producing countries. Renewable Energy, 184, 871-880, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.12.022 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    38. Kartal, M. T. (2023). Production-based disaggregated analysis of energy consumption and CO2 emission nexus: Evidence from the USA by novel dynamic ARDL simulation approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(3), 6864-6874, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22714-5 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    39. Kartal, M. T., Kiliç Depren, S., Kirikkaleli, D., et al. (2022). Asymmetric and long-run impact of political stability on consumption-based carbon dioxide emissions in Finland: Evidence from nonlinear and Fourier-based approaches. Journal of Environmental Management, 321, 116043, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116043 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    40. Kartal, M. T., Pata, U. K., Kiliç Depren, S., et al. (2023). Effects of possible changes in natural gas, nuclear, and coal energy consumption on CO2 emissions: Evidence from France under Russia's gas supply cuts by dynamic ARDL simulations approach. Applied Energy, 339, 120983, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120983 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    41. Kartal, M. T., Kiliç Depren, S., Kirikkaleli, D. (2023). Asymmetric effect of political stability on production-based CO2 emissions in the UK: Long-run evidence from nonlinear ARDL and frequency domain causality. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(12), 33886-33897, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24550-z Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    42. Kirikkaleli, D., Shah, M. I., Adebayo, T. S., et al. (2022). Does political risk spur environmental issues in China? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(41), 62637-62647, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19951-z Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    43. Kiliç Depren, S., Kartal, M. T., Kirikkaleli, D., et al. (2023). Effect of political stability on environmental quality: Long-run and asymmetric evidence from Iceland by non-linear approaches. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 16, 1407-1417, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-023-01351-y Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    44. Koenker, R. (2005). Quantile Regression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780511754098. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    45. Lee, K.-H., Min, B. (2015). Green R&D for eco-innovation and its impact on carbon emissions and firm performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 534-542, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.114 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    46. Li, H., Ali, M. S. E., Ayub, B., et al. (2023). Analysing the impact of geopolitical risk and economic policy uncertainty on the environmental sustainability: Evidence from BRICS countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26553-w Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    47. Liu, K., Lin, B. (2019). Research on influencing factors of environmental pollution in China: A spatial econometric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 206, 356-364, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.194 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    48. Mushafiq, M., Prusak, B. (2023). Nexus between stock markets, economic strength, R&D and environmental deterioration: New evidence from EU-27 using PNARDL approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(12), 32965-32984, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24458-8 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    49. Nawaz, M. Z., Guo, J., Nawaz, S., et al. (2023). Sustainable development goals perspective: Nexus between Christians' religious tourism, geopolitical risk, and CO2 pollution in Italy. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(22), 62341-62354, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26463-x Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    50. Nurgazina, Z., Guo, Q., Ali, U., et al. (2022). Retesting the influences on CO2 emissions in China: Evidence from dynamic ARDL approach. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 868740, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.868740 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    51. Okumus, I., Erdogan, S. (2021). Analyzing the tourism development and ecological footprint nexus: Evidence from the countries with fastest-growing rate of tourism GDP. In: Balsalobre-Lorente, D., Driha, O. M., Shahbaz, M. Strategies in Sustainable Tourism, Economic Growth and Clean Energy, 141-154, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59675-0_8 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    52. Palmer, K., Oates, W. E., Portney, P. R. (1995). Tightening environmental standards: The benefit-cost or the no-cost paradigm? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 119-132, https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.119 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    53. Pata, U. K. (2018). The influence of coal and noncarbohydrate energy consumption on CO2 emissions: revisiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Turkey. Energy, 160, 1115-1123, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.07.095 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    54. Pata, U. K. (2021). Linking renewable energy, globalization, agriculture, CO2 emissions and ecological footprint in BRIC countries: A sustainability perspective. Renewable Energy, 173, 197-208, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.03.125 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    55. Pata, U. K., Çağlar, A. E. (2021). Investigating the EKC hypothesis with renewable energy consumption, human capital, globalization and trade openness for China: Evidence from augmented ARDL approach with a structural break. Energy, 216, 119220, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119220 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    56. Pata, U. K., Ertuğrul, H. M. (2023). Do the Kyoto Protocol, geopolitical risks, human capital and natural resources affect the sustainability limit? A new environmental approach based on the LCC hypothesis. Resources Policy, 81, 103352, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103352 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    57. Pata, U. K., Kartal, M. T. (2023). Impact of nuclear and renewable energy sources on environment quality: Testing the EKC and LCC hypotheses for South Korea. Nuclear Engineering and Technology, 55(2), 587-594, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2022.10.027 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    58. Pata, U. K., Caglar, A. E., Kartal, M. T., et al. (2023). Evaluation of the role of clean energy technologies, human capital, urbanization, and income on the environmental quality in the United States. Journal of Cleaner Production, 402, 136802, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136802 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    59. Pata, U. K., Erdoğan, S., Ozkan, O. (2023). Is reducing fossil fuel intensity important for environmental management and ensuring ecological efficiency in China? Journal of Environmental Management, 329, 117080, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117080 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    60. Pata, U. K., Kartal, M. T., Erdoğan, S., et al. (2023). The role of renewable and nuclear energy R&D expenditures and income on environmental quality in Germany: Scrutinizing the EKC and LCC hypotheses with smooth structural changes. Applied Energy, 342, 121138, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121138 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    61. PRS Group (2023). Country Risk Data. Mount Pleasant: PRS Group. Obtained by email on 16 June 2023.
    62. Rehman, M. A., Fareed, Z., Salem, S., et al. (2021). Do diversified export, agriculture, and cleaner energy consumption induce atmospheric pollution in Asia? application of method of moments quantile regression. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 781097, https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.781097 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    63. Riti, J. S., Shu, Y., Riti, M. K. J. (2022). Geopolitical risk and environmental degradation in BRICS: Aggregation bias and policy inference. Energy Policy, 166, 113010, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.113010 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    64. Shahbaz, M., Balcilar, M., Mahalik, M. K., et al. (2023). Is causality between globalization and energy consumption bidirectional or unidirectional in top and bottom globalized economies? International Journal of Finance & Economics, 28(2), 1939-1964, https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.2519 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    65. Shahbaz, M., Sinha, A. (2019). Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: A literature survey. Journal of Economic Studies, 46(1), 106-168, https://doi.org/10.1108/JES-09-2017-0249 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    66. Sim, N., Zhou, H. (2015). Oil prices, US stock return, and the dependence between their quantiles. Journal of Banking & Finance, 55, 1-8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2015.01.013 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    67. Simionescu, M., Radulescu, M., Balsalobre-Lorente, D., et al. (2023). Pollution, political instabilities and electricity price in the cee countries during the war time. Journal of Environmental Management, 343, 118206, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118206 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    68. Sohail, M. T., Majeed, M. T., Shaikh, P. A., et al. (2022). Environmental costs of political instability in Pakistan: Policy options for clean energy consumption and environment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(17), 25184-25193, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17646-5 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    69. Sweidan, O. D. (2023). The effect of geopolitical risk on environmental stress: Evidence from a panel analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(10), 25712-25727, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23909-6 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    70. Syed, Q. R., Bhowmik, R., Adedoyin, F. F., et al. (2022). Do economic policy uncertainty and geopolitical risk surge CO2 emissions? New insights from panel quantile regression approach. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(19), 27845-27861, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17707-9 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    71. Troster, V. (2018). Testing for Granger-causality in quantiles. Econometric Reviews, 37(8), 850-866, https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2016.1172400 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    72. Ul Husnain, M. I. U., Syed, Q. R., Bashir, A., et al. (2022). Do geopolitical risk and energy consumption contribute to environmental degradation? Evidence from E7 countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(27), 41640-41652, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17606-z Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    73. Ullah, S., Luo, R., Adebayo, T. S., et al. (2023). Paving the ways toward sustainable development: The asymmetric effect of economic complexity, renewable electricity, and foreign direct investment on the environmental sustainability in BRICS-T. Environment, Development and Sustainability, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03085-4 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    74. Ulussever, T., Kiliç Depren, S., Kartal, M. T., et al. (2023). Estimation performance comparison of machine learning approaches and time series econometric models: Evidence from the effect of sector-based energy consumption on CO2 emissions in the USA. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(18), 52576-52592, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26050-0 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    75. UN (2023). Promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all. [Retrieved 2023-07-12] Available at: https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal8
    76. Wang, Z., Chandavuth, Y., Zhang, B., et al. (2023). Environmental degradation, renewable energy, and economic growth nexus: Assessing the role of financial and political risks? Journal of Environmental Management, 325, 116678, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116678 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    77. Wang, W., Niu, Y., Gapich, A., et al. (2023). Natural resources extractions and carbon neutrality: The role of geopolitical risk. Resources Policy, 83, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103577 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    78. Walley, N., Whitehead, B. (1994). It's not easy being green. [Retrieved 2023-07-13] Available at: https://hbr.org/1994/05/its-not-easy-being-green
    79. Zhao, W., Zhong, R., Sohail, S, et al. (2021). Geopolitical risks, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions in BRICS: An asymmetric analysis. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(29), 39668-39679, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-13505-5 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...

    Tento článek je publikován v režimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), která umožňuje nekomerční distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.


    Zpět na obsah