Politická ekonomie 2022, 70(5):617-637 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.1364

Political Economy of Illiberal Capitalism in Hungary and Poland

Jakub Szabó ORCID...a
a The Institute of Political Science of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovak republic

Has the recent illiberal surge altered the neoliberal orthodoxy prevailing in post-1989 Hungary and Poland towards a more developmental modus operandi, or has it just camouflaged embedded neoliberalism with a developmental narrative? This article, trying to contribute to answering the aforementioned question, is structured as follows. First, we provide a general overview of the comparative capitalism approach. We extend the original conceptualizations by the framework of varieties of illiberal capitalism and present two ideal types of illiberal capitalism. Then, we assess five institutional areas of the political economy of contemporary Hungary and Poland. We conclude that although Hungary remains faithful to the neoliberal economic orthodoxy so far with illiberal political forces merely camouflaging its true essence due to political and utilitarian reasons, the post-2015 government in Poland managed to move its economic model closer to a more developmental modus operandi.

Keywords: Varieties of illiberal capitalism, neoliberal market economy, developmental market economy, Hungary, Poland
JEL classification: F52, O57, P16

Received: September 23, 2021; Revised: April 20, 2022; Accepted: July 1, 2022; Published: December 5, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Szabó, J. (2022). Political Economy of Illiberal Capitalism in Hungary and Poland. Politická ekonomie70(5), 617-637. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.1364
Download citation

References

  1. Bohle, D., Greskovits, B. (2012). Capitalist Diversity on Europe's Periphery. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-0-8014-5110-2.
  2. Bohle, D., Greskovits, B. (2019). Politicising embedded neoliberalism: continuity and change in Hungary's development model. West European Politics, 42(5), 1069-1093, https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2018.1511958 Go to original source...
  3. Bukowski, P., Novokmet, F. (2021). Between Communism and Capitalism: Long-Term Inequality in Poland, 1892-2015. Journal of Economic Growth, 26(4), 187-239, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-021-09190-1 Go to original source...
  4. Csaba, L. (2022). Unorthodoxy in Hungary: an illiberal success story? Post-Communist Economies, 34(1), 1-14, https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2019.1641949 Go to original source...
  5. Czech, S., Kassner, M. (2021). Counter-movement at a critical juncture: A neo-Polanyian interpretation of the rise of the illiberal Right in Poland. Intersections: East European Journal of Society and Politics, 7(2), 128-148, https://doi.org/10.17356/ieejsp.v7i2.733 Go to original source...
  6. Farkas, B. (2016). Models of capitalism in the European Union. Post-Crisis perspective. London: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-1-137-60057-8. Go to original source...
  7. Gardawski, J., Towalski, R. (2020). The comparative analysis of the industrial relations systems in Europe. International Journal of Management and Economics, 56(1), 42-62, https://doi.org/10.2478/ijme-2020-0003 Go to original source...
  8. Granovetter, M., Swedberg, R. (2018). The sociology of economic life. 3rd edition. New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-8133-4455-3. Go to original source...
  9. Hall, A. P., Soskice, D. (2001). An Introduction to Varieties of Capitalism. In: Hall, A. P., Soskice, D. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-924774-9. Go to original source...
  10. Hans, C. (2019). Repatriating Polanyi: Market Society in the Visegrád States. Budapest: Central European University Press. ISBN 978-963-386-287-2.
  11. Horbaczewska, B. (2019). Comparative empirical analysis of financial intermediation systems in Central and Eastern Europe. International Journal of Management and Economic, 55(3), 250-267, https://doi.org/10.2478/ijme-2019-0016 Go to original source...
  12. Lendvai-Bainton, N., Szelewa, D. (2020). Governing new authoritarianism: Populism, nationalism and radical welfare reform in Hungary and Poland. Social Policy & Administration, 55(4), 559-572, https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12642 Go to original source...
  13. Lindstaedt, N. (2021). Democratic Decay and Authoritarian Resurgence. Bristol: Bristol University Press. ISBN 978-1529210392. Go to original source...
  14. Magyar, B. (2019). Parallel System Narratives - Polish and Hungarian regime formations compared: A structuralist essay. In: Magyar, B. Stubborn Structures: Reconceptualizing Postcommunist Regimes. Budapest: Central European University Press. ISBN 978-963-386-214-8. Go to original source...
  15. Magyar, B., Madlovics, B. (2020). The Anatomy of Post-Communist Regimes: A Conceptual Framework. Budapest: Central European University Press. ISBN 978-963-386-371-8. Go to original source...
  16. Mihályi, P., Szelényi. I. (2019). Rent-seekers, Profits, Wages and Inequality: The Top 20 Percent. London: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-3-030-03846-5. Go to original source...
  17. Mihályi, P., Szelényi. I. (2020). The Two Forms of Modern Capitalism: Liberal and Illiberal States. A Criticism of the Varieties of Capitalism Paradigm. Comparative Sociology, 19(2), 155-175, https://doi.org/10.1163/15691330-bja10006 Go to original source...
  18. North, D. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 9780511808678. Go to original source...
  19. Nölke, A., Vliegenthart, A. (2009). Enlarging the Varieties of Capitalism: The Emergence of Dependent Market Economies in East Central Europe. World Politics, 61(4), 670-702, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0043887109990098 Go to original source...
  20. OECD (2011). Education at a Glance 2011: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2011-en Go to original source...
  21. OECD (2014). OECD Economic Surveys: Hungary 2014. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/eco_surveys-hun-2014-en Go to original source...
  22. OECD (2019). Society at a Glance 2019: OECD Social Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/soc_glance-2019-en Go to original source...
  23. OECD (2021). Education at a Glance 2021: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing, https://doi.org/10.1787/b35a14e5-en Go to original source...
  24. Polanyi, K. (2001). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press. ISBN 9780807056431.
  25. Próchniak, M. (2018). The impact of product market competition on GDP per capita growth in the EU countries: does the model of capitalism matter? Post-Communist Economies, 30(2), 131-155, https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2017.1362098 Go to original source...
  26. Przybylski, W. (2018). Can Poland's Backsliding Be Stopped? Journal of Democracy, 29(3), 52-64, https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2018.0044 Go to original source...
  27. Rapacki, R. et al. (2019). Diversity of Patchwork Capitalism in Central and Eastern Europe. London and New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-429-05690-1. Go to original source...
  28. Sass, M. (2017). Is a live dog better than a dead lion? Seeking alternative growth engines in the Visegrád countries. In: Galgóczi, B., Drahokoupil, J. Condemned to Be Left Behind? Can Central and Eastern Europe Emerge from Its Low Wage Model? Brussels: ETUI. ISBN 978-2-87452-462-2.
  29. Scharle, A. (2017). Labour market policy thematic review 2017: An in-depth analysis of the impact of reforms on inequality. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  30. Scheiring, G. (2020). The Retreat of Liberal Democracy. Authoritarian Capitalism and the Accumulative State in Hungary. London: Palgrave Macmillan. ISBN 978-3-030-48751-5. Go to original source...
  31. Scheiring, G., Szombati, K. (2020). From neoliberal disembedding to authoritarian re-embedding: The making of neoliberal hegemony in Hungary. International Sociology, 35(6), 721-738, https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580920930591 Go to original source...
  32. Szabó, J., Kurucz, J. (2022). The Death of Neoliberalism or a Mere Camouflage? Polanyian Countermovement in Hungary & Poland. Forum for Social Economics, 51, https://doi.org/10.1080/07360932.2022.2052737 Go to original source...
  33. Szelényi, I., Mihályi, P. (2020). Varieties of Post-Communist Capitalism: A Comparative Analysis of Russia, Eastern Europe and China. Leiden: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-41319-1. Go to original source...
  34. Szikra, D. (2014). Democracy and welfare in hard times: The social policy of the Orbán Government in Hungary between 2010 and 2014. Journal of European Social Policy, 24(5), 486-500, https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928714545446 Go to original source...
  35. Topliąek, A. (2020). The Political Economy of Populist Rule in Post-Crisis Europe: Hungary and Poland. New Political Economy, 25(3), 388-403, https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1598960 Go to original source...
  36. Várhegyi, E. (2017). The Banks of the Mafia State. In: Magyar, B., Vásárhelyi, J. Twenty-Five Sides of the Post-Communist Mafia State. Budapest: Central European University Press, 295-310. ISBN 978-615-5513-62-6. Go to original source...
  37. Wade, H. R. (2018). The Developmental State: Dead or Alive? Development and Change, 49(2), 518-546, https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12381 Go to original source...
  38. Weber, M. (2019). Economy and Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN 9780674916548. Go to original source...
  39. Williamson, O. (2000). The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595-613, https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.3.595 Go to original source...
  40. Żurawski, A. (2019). Diversity of education systems in the European Union. International Journal of Management and Economics, 55(3), 1-20, https://doi.org/10.2478/ijme-2019-0030 Go to original source...
  41. Szabó, J., Kurucz, J. (2022). The Death of Neoliberalism or a Mere Camouflage? Polanyian Countermovement in Hungary & Poland. Forum for Social Economics, 51, https://doi.org/10.1080/07360932.2022.2052737 Go to original source...
  42. Szelényi, I., Mihályi, P. (2020). Varieties of Post-Communist Capitalism: A Comparative Analysis of Russia, Eastern Europe and China. Leiden: Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-41319-1. Go to original source...
  43. Szikra, D. (2014). Democracy and welfare in hard times: The social policy of the Orbán Government in Hungary between 2010 and 2014. Journal of European Social Policy, 24(5), 486-500, https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928714545446 Go to original source...
  44. Topliąek, A. (2020). The Political Economy of Populist Rule in Post-Crisis Europe: Hungary and Poland. New Political Economy, 25(3), 388-403, https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1598960 Go to original source...
  45. Várhegyi, E. (2017). The Banks of the Mafia State. In: Magyar, B., Vásárhelyi, J. Twenty-Five Sides of the Post-Communist Mafia State. Budapest: Central European University Press, 295-310. ISBN 978-615-5513-62-6. Go to original source...
  46. Wade, H. R. (2018). The Developmental State: Dead or Alive? Development and Change, 49(2), 518-546, https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12381 Go to original source...
  47. Weber, M. (2019). Economy and Society. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. ISBN 9780674916548. Go to original source...
  48. Williamson, O. (2000). The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stock, Looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(3), 595-613, https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.3.595 Go to original source...
  49. Żurawski, A. (2019). Diversity of education systems in the European Union. International Journal of Management and Economics, 55(3), 1-20, https://doi.org/10.2478/ijme-2019-0030 Go to original source...
  50. Temporary employment (% of L)Social expenditure (€ per inhabitant)Amable, B. (2003). The Diversity of Modern Capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19-926114-8.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.