Politická ekonomie 2015, 63(4):498-516 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.1032

Odhad nákladov nezamestnanosti v podmienkach slovenskej ekonomiky

Tomáš Domonkos, Brian König
Ekonomický ústav SAV, Bratislava.

Estimation of the Cost of Unemployment in Slovak Republic

The aim of the presented paper is to estimate the cost of unemployment in the Slovak Economy. The cost of unemployment can be divided into a direct component, composed of decreasing government revenues due to reduced direct taxes and social contribution payments from the employees and the employers; increased public spending on unemployment benefi ts, social security and health insurance and finally increased expenditures on running the administration of unemployed persons and active labor market policies. The second part, consisting of indirect costs, is composed of one component, represented by the decreasing collection of indirect taxes. The analysis showed that the average estimated real monthly cost per one unemployed throughout the years 2008-2012 fall within the range from 416 euros to 588 euros.

Keywords: unemployment, cost of unemployment, labor market, direct costs of unemployment, indirect costs of unemployment
JEL classification: E24, J64

Zveřejněno: 1. srpen 2015  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Domonkos, T., & König, B. (2015). Odhad nákladov nezamestnanosti v podmienkach slovenskej ekonomiky. Politická ekonomie, 63(4), 498-516. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.1032
Stáhnout citaci
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Zobrazit celý článek

    Reference

    1. ČADIL, J.; PAVELKA, T.; KAŇKOVÁ, E.; VORLÍČEK, J. 2011. Odhad nákladů nezaměstnanosti z pohledu veřejných rozpočtů. Politická ekonomie. 2011, Vol. 59, No. 5, pp. 618-637. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    2. DAO, M.; LOUNGANI, P. 2010. The Human Cost of Recessions: Assessing It, Reducing It. IMF Staff Position Note (SPN/10/17), November 11, 2010. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/spn/2010/spn1017.pdf. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    3. DOMONKOS, T.; JÁNOŠOVÁ, M.; OSTRIHOŇ, F. 2013. Analysing inclusive growth: empirical evidence from the Slovak Republic. Ekonomický časopis. 2013, Vol. 61, No. 9, pp. 918-933.
    4. ELBONA. 2006. Náklady státu na jednoho nezaměstnaného. Elbona, 2006. http://portal.mpsv.cz/sz/politikazamest/vyzkumnestudie.
    5. EUROPEAN COMMISION. 2010. Europe 2020: A Strategy for Smarter, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. March 3rd. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:2020:FIN:EN:PDF.
    6. EUROPEAN COMMISION. 2013. Alert Mechanism Report 2014. http://ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/economic_governance/macroeconomic_imbalance_procedure/index_en.htm.
    7. HELLIWELL, J. F.; HUANG, H. 2011. NBER Working Paper Series New Measures of the Costs of Unemployment: Evidence From The Subjective Well-Being of 3.3 Million Aamericans. National Bureau of Economic Research, [Working Paper No. 16829]. www.nber.org/papers/w16829. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    8. KÖNIG, B.; DOMONKOS, T. 2014. Estimation of indirect costs of unemployment (cross country comparison - SR and CZ). Quantitative methods in economics: multiple criteria decision making XVII: proceedings of the international scientific conference: 28th - 30th May 2014.Virt, Slovakia: Ekonóm 2014, pp. 123-127. ISBN 978-80-225-3868-8.
    9. KNOTEK, E. S. 2007. How Useful is Okun's Law? Economic Review. Vol. 2007, Q IV, pp. 73-103.
    10. LEE, J. 2000. The Robustness of Okun's Law: Evidence from OECD Countries. Journal of Macroeconomics. 2000, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 331-356. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    11. MAARTEN, G.; VALSAMIS, D.; Van der BEKEN, W. 2012. Why invest in employment? A study on the cost of unemployment. Final report. On behalf of: European Federation for Services to Individuals (EFSI). Brussels, December 2012. www.efsi-europe.eu/fileadmin/MEDIA/publications/Cost_of_unemployment_report/English_ Study_on_the_cost_of_unemployment_January_2013.pdf.
    12. MOOSA, I. A. 1997. A Cross-Country Comparison of Okun's Coefficient. Journal of Comparative Economics. 1997, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 335-356. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    13. MORVAY, K. 2013. Osobitosti vývoja štruktúry príjmov v slovenskej ekonomike. Ekonomický časopis. 2013, Vol. 61, No. 4, pp. 327-343.
    14. STOCK, L.; VOGLER-LUDWIG, K. 2010. NAIRU and Okun's Law - The Macro-Economy in a Nutshell? Final report. Thematic Paper for the European Commission, Directorate General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, Munich, 22 June 2010.
    15. STRATFORD, D.; WALL, H. J. 2000. The Revealed Cost of Unemployment. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review. 2000, Vol. 82, No. 2, pp. 1-10. http://research.stlouisfed.org/publications/review/00/03/0003sd.pdf. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    16. ŠTEFÁNIK, M. 2014. Estimating treatment effects of a training programme in Slovakia using propensity score matching. Ekonomický časopis. 2014, Vol. 62, No. 6, pp. 631-645.

    Tento článek je publikován v režimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), která umožňuje nekomerční distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.


    Zpět na obsah