Politická ekonomie 2008, 56(2):242-256 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.639
Bližší pohled na užitek maximalizovaný ekonomickými subjekty
- Česká národní banka; Univerzita Karlova v Praze.
A closer look at utility maximised by economic agents
The relatively new stream of research on various types of utilities is reviewed and discussed together with some of its implications. The distinction is explained among experienced utility, remembered utility and predicted utility as three candidates for decision utility. Examples of selected empirical findings are given which show discrepancies, first, between past experienced utility and remembered utility and, second, between predicted utility and actual future experienced utility. Some critical reactions to the findings are briefly mentioned as well as implications for the debate on some important moral issues such as paternalism and HIV testing. It is concluded that there may be some methodological doubts about the empirical evidence available so far but even so, the evidence indicates that the tendency of models in economics to work with "the" utility to be maximised may be an overly simplified picture of the actual process of evaluation of outcomes.
Keywords: utility, experienced utility, remembered utility, predicted utility, empathy gap, temptation gap
JEL classification: D10, D46
Zveřejněno: 1. duben 2008 Zobrazit citaci
Reference
- ARIELY, D.; LOEWENSTEIN, G. 2000. When does duration matter in judgment and decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2000, vol. 129, no. 4, s. 508-523.
Přejít k původnímu zdroji... - ARIELY, D.; KAHNEMAN, D.; LOEWENSTEIN, G. 2000. Joint comment on "When does duration matter in judgment and decision making?" [ARIELY; LOEWENSTEIN, 2000]. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2000, vol. 129, no. 4, s. 524-529.
Přejít k původnímu zdroji... - FREDERICK, S.; KAHNEMAN, D. 2002. Representativeness revisited: Attribute substitution in intuitive judgment. In GILOVICH, T.; GRIFFIN, D.; KAHNEMAN, D. (eds.). Heuristics & Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. New York : Cambridge University Press, 2002.
- KAHNEMAN, D. 1994. New challenges to the rationality assumption. Journal for Institutional and Theoretical Economics. 1994, vol. 150, no. 1, s. 18-36. Repr. in KAHNEMAN, D.; TVERSKY, A. (eds.). Choices, Values, and Frames. New York : Russell Sage Foundation, 2000.
- KAHNEMAN, D.; FREDRICKSON, B. L.; SCHREIBER, C. A.; REDELMEIER, D. A. 1993. When more pain is preferred to less: Adding a better end. Psychological Science. 1993, vol. 4, no. 6, s. 401-405.
Přejít k původnímu zdroji... - KAHNEMAN, D.; WAKKER, P.; SARIN, R. 1997. Back to Bentham? Explorations of experienced utility. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1997, vol. 112, no. 2, s. 375-405.
Přejít k původnímu zdroji... - LOEWENSTEIN, G.; O'DONOGHUE, T.; RABIN, M. 2003. Projection bias in predicting future utility. Quarterly J. of Economics. 2003, vol. 118, no. 4, s. 1209-1248.
Přejít k původnímu zdroji... - LOEWENSTEIN, G.; SCHKADE, D. 1999. Wouldn't it be nice? Predicting future feelings. In KAHNEMAN, D.; DIENER, E., SCHWARZ, N. (eds.). Well-being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. New York : Russell Sage Foundation, 1999.
- READ, D.; Van LEEUWEN, B. 1998. Predicting hunger: The effects of appetite and delay on choice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1998, vol. 76, no. 2, s. 189-205.
Přejít k původnímu zdroji... - SELTEN, R. 1994. New challenges to the rationality assumption: comment. Journal for Institutional and Theoretical Economics. 1994, vol. 150, no. 1, s. 42-44.
- SIEFF, E. M.; DAWES, R. M.; LOEWENSTEIN, G. 1997. Anticipated versus actual responses to HIV Test Results. American Journal of Psychology. 1997, vol. 112, no. 2, s. 297-311.
Přejít k původnímu zdroji... - SKOŘEPA, M. 2004. Daniel Kahneman a psychologické základy ekonomie. Politická ekonomie. 2004, roč. 52, č. 2, s. 247-255.
Přejít k původnímu zdroji... - SUNSTEIN, C. 1997. Behavioral analysis of law. University of Chicago Law School. 1997, vol. 64, no. 4, s. 1175-1195.
Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
Tento článek je publikován v režimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), která umožňuje nekomerční distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.
