Politická ekonomie 2006, 54(5):583-609 | DOI: 10.18267/j.polek.574

Institucionální aspekty nové komparativní ekonomie: ČR a EU

Milan Žák, Petr Vymětal
1 Centrum ekonomických studií, Vysoká škola ekonomie a managementu, Praha.
2 Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, Vysoká škola ekonomie a managementu, Praha.

Institutional aspects of new comparative economy: Czech republic and European union

The study focuses on evaluation of institutional quality in European Union countries and its possible impact on economic performance and competitiveness. The text stems from the theoretical framework of new institutional economics, especially historical and comparative institutionalism, and it bases on the concept of good governance. The source of the evaluation is the scheme of the World Bank Governance Matters, supplemented with research of other institutions working with individual institutional characteristics. Authors evaluate following characteristics - voice and accountability, political stability, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, rule of law and control of corruption, which together form aggregate indicator of institutional quality. Old member countries of European Union (EU-15) are classified into different models of capitalism according to their different institutional quality. Institutional changes in new member countries (EU-10, eventually EU-8) in period 1996-2004 illustrate both institutional adjustment of postcommunist countries and dynamics of these changes and their convergence to different types of capitalism.

Keywords: institutional quality, comparative institutionalism, institutional characteristics, models of capitalism, institutional adaptation
JEL classification: E62, H5, K2, K4, P1, P5

Zveřejněno: 1. říjen 2006  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Žák, M., & Vymětal, P. (2006). Institucionální aspekty nové komparativní ekonomie: ČR a EU. Politická ekonomie, 54(5), 583-609. doi: 10.18267/j.polek.574
Stáhnout citaci
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Zobrazit celý článek

    Reference

    1. Acemoglu, D.: The Form of Properte Rights: Oligarchic vs. Democratic Societies. Cambridge, MA, National Bureau of Economic Research 2003 (NBER Working Paper No. 10037). http://www.nber.org/papers/w10037. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    2. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J.: Institutions as the Fundamentals Cause of Long-run Growth. CEDE 2004, no. 33. http://www.nber.org/papers/W10481. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    3. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J.: The Rise of Europe: Atlantic Trade, Institutional Change and Economic Growth. 2002. http://www.nber.org/papers/w9378. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    4. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S.: Unbundling Institutions. Cambridge, MA, MIT 2003. http://papers.nber.org/papers/w9934.pdf. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    5. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J.: The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development at Empirical Investigation. American Economic Review. 2000, p. 1369-1401. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    6. Alston, L.J., Eggertsson, T., North, D.C. (eds.): Empirical Studies in Institutional Change. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press 1996. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    7. Amable, B.: Diversity of Modern Capitalism. Oxford, Oxford University Press 2003. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    8. Aron, J.: Growth and Institutions: A Review of the Evidence. World Bank Observer. 2000, no. 1, p. 99-135. http://www.worldbank.org/research/journals/wbro/obsfeb00/Article_6.pdf. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    9. Assaad, R.: Formal and Informal Institutions in the Labor Market, with Applications to the Construction Sector in Egypt. World Development. 1993, no. 6, p. 925-939. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    10. Atieno, R.: Formal and Informal Institutions´ Lending Policies and Access to Credit by Small-scale Enterprises in Kenya: An Empirical Assessment. Nairobi, African Economic Research Consortium 2001 (AERC Research Paper No. 111).
    11. Avdagic, S.: Accounting for Variations in Trade Union Effectiveness: State-Labor Relations in East Central Europe. Kõln am Rhein, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies 2003 (Working Paper No. 6). http://www.mpi-fg-koeln.mpg.de/pu/mpifg_dp/dp03-6.pdf.
    12. Ayal, E.B., Karras, G.: Components of Economic Freedom and Growth: An Empirical Study. Journal of Developing Areas. 1998, no. 3, p. 327-338.
    13. Baccaro, L.: What is Alive and What is Dead in the Theory of Corporatism. British Journal of Industrial Relations. 2003, no. 4, p. 683-706. http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/inst/download/dp14302.pdf. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    14. Barro, R.: Economic Growth in a Gross Section of Countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1991, p. 407-444. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    15. Beck, T., Clarke, G., Groff, P., Keefer, P., Walsh, P.: New Tools and New Tests in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions. Washington, DC, World Bank 2004. http://econ.worldbank.org/docs/1037.pdf.
    16. Beck, T., Laeven, L.: Institution Building and Growth in Transition Economies. Washington, DC, World Bank 2005 (Research Policy Working Paper No. 3657). http://wwwwds.worldbank.org/sevlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2005/07/06/000016406_20050706094358/Rendered/PDF/wps3657.pdf. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    17. Becker, D.C.: Grassroots to Grassroots: Why Forrest Preservation was Rapid at Loma Alta, Ecuador. World Development. 2003, no. 1, p. 163-176. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    18. Berglöf, E., Claessens, S.: Corporate Governance and Enforcement. Washington, DC, World Bank 2004 (Working Paper No. 3409). http://wdsbeta.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/IW3P/IB/2004/10/06/000012009_20041006152130/Rendered/PDF/wps340 9.pdf. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    19. Blanchard, O.: The Economic Future of Europe. Cambridge, MA, NBER 2004 (Working Paper No. 10310). http://www.nber.org/papers/w10310.
    20. Bodner, S., Bodmer, F., Kobler, M.: Institutional Efficiency and its Determinants - the Role of Political Factors in Economic Growth. Paris, OECD Development Centre Studies 2004. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    21. Bohle, D., Greskovits, B.: Capital, Labor, and the Prospects of the European Social Model in the East. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University 2004 (Central and Eastern Europe Working Paper No. 58). http://www.ces.fas.harvard.edu/publications/Bohle.pdf.
    22. Djankov, S., Glaeser, E.L., La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., Shleifer, A.: The New Comparative Economics. London, CEPR 2003 (Discussion Paper No. 3882). http://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/pages/faculty/rafael.laporta/publications/LaPorta%20PDF%20Papers-ALL/New%20Comparative%20Economics.pdf.
    23. Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., Shleifer, A.: The Regulation of Entry. 2001 (third draft). http://rru.worldbank.org/Documents/PapersLinks/551.pdf.
    24. Dollar, D., Kraay, A.: Institutions, Trade and Growth. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy Paper 2002.
    25. Easterly, W.: Can Institutions Resolve Ethnic Conflict. Economic Development and Cultural Change. 2001, no. 49, p. 687-706 (The University of Chicago Press). Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    26. Ebbinghaus, B., Manow, P. (eds.): Comparing Welfare Capitalism: Social Policy and Political Economy in Europe, Japan and the USA. London, Routledge 2001. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    27. Ebbinghaus, B.: Can Path Dependence Explain Institutional Change Two Approaches Applied to Welfare State Reform. Kõln am Rhein, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies 2005 (Working Paper No. 2). http://www.mpi-fg-koeln.mpg.de/pu/mpifg_dp/dp05-2.pdf.
    28. EBRD: Law in Transition 2005: Courts and Judges. London, European Bank for Reconstruction and Development 2005.
    29. Engerman, S.L., Sokoloff, K.L.: Factor Endowments, Inequality, and Paths of Development among New World Eco no mies. Cambridge, MA, NBER 2002 (Wor king Paper No. 9259). http://papers.nber.org/papers/w9259.pdf. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    30. Estache, A., Martimort, D.: Politics, Transaction Costs, and the Design of Regulatory Institutions. Washington, DC, World Bank 1999 (Working Paper No. 2073). http://info.worldbank.org/etools/docs/library/17668/wps2073.pdf. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    31. EUROSTAT: The EU-15´s New Economy - A Statistical Portrait. Luxemburg 2005. http://epp.eurostat.cec.eu.int/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-AV-05-001/EN/KS-AV-05-001-EN.PDF.
    32. Fagerberg, J., Knell, M., Srholec, M.: The Competitiveness of Nations. Geneva, UNECE 2004. http://www.unece.org/ead/sem/sem2004/papers/Fagerberg.pdf.
    33. Fraser Institute: The Economic Freedom of the World - 2005 Annual Report. Fraser Institute 2005. http://www.fraserinstitute.ca/admin/books/chapterfiles/EFW2005complete.pdf#.
    34. Freedom House: Freedom in the World 2005: The Annual Survey of Political Rights and Civil Liberties. Freedom House 2005. http://www.freedomhouse.org/research/index.htm#reports.
    35. Glaeser, E.L., La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., Shleifer, A.: Do Institutions Cause Growth? Cambridge, MA, Harvard University 2004. http://www.nber.org/papers/W10568. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    36. Glaeser, E.L., Schleifer, A.: The Rise of Regulatory State. Cambridge, MA, NBER 2001 (Working Paper No. 8650). http://www.nber.org/papers/w8650. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    37. Goldstone J.A., Gurr, T.R., Harff, B., Levy, M.A., Marshall, M.G., Bates, R.H., Epstein, D.L., Kahl, C.H., Surko, P.T., Ulfelder, J.C., Unger, A.N.: State Failure Task Force Report: Phase III Findings. Maryland, Center for International Development and Conflict Management, University of Maryland 2000. http://www.cidcm.umd.edu/inscr/stfail/SFTF%20Phase%20III%20Report%20Final.pdf.
    38. Gordon, R.J.: Two Centuries of Economic Growth: Europe Chasing the American Frontier. Cambridge, MA, NBER 2002 (Working Paper No. 10662). http://www.nber.org/papers/w10662.pdf.
    39. Gupta, S., Leruth, L., De Mello, L., Chakravarti, S.: Transition Economies: How Appropriate is the Size and Scope of Government? Washington, DC, IMF 2001 (Working Paper No. 55). http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2001/wp0155.pdf. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    40. Hellman, J., Kaufmann, D.: The Inequality of Influence. Washington, DC, World Bank 2002 (preliminary draft). http://info.worldbank.org/etools/docs/library/17354/inequality_influence.pdf. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    41. Hellwig, M.: Optimal Income Taxation, Public-Goods Provision and Public-Sector Pricing: A Contribution to the Foundations of Public Economics. Mannheim, Sander Forschungsbereich 504 2004 (Working Paper No. 04-42).http://www.mpp-rdg.mpg.de/pdf_dat/2004_14online.pdf. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    42. Heritage Foundation: Index of Economic Freedom. Heritage Foundation 2005. http://www.heritage.org/research/features/index/.
    43. House, J.D., McGrath, K.: Innovative Governance and Development in the New Ireland: Social Partnership and the Integrate Approach. Governance. 2004, no. 1, p. 29-58. http://www.blackwellsynergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.0952-1895.2004.00236.x. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    44. Howell, L.D. (ed.): Handbook of Country and Political Risk Analysis. New York, The PRS Group. Inc. 2001.
    45. IMD: World Competitiveness Yearbook 2004. International Institute for Management and Development 2004.
    46. Jarmuzek, M.: Are the EU New Members States Fiscally Sustainable? An Empirical Analysis. University College London, Centre for the Study of Economic and Social Change in Europe 2005 (Working Paper No. 51). http://www.ssees.ac.uk/publications/working_papers/wp51.pdf.
    47. Jiráková, E.: Vybrané přístupy k hodnocení míry korupce. Praha, CES VŠEM 2005 (pracovní sešit č. 9).
    48. Jütting. J.: Institutions and Development: A Critical Review. Paris, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 2003 (Working Paper No. 210). http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/19/63/4536968.pdf. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    49. KADEŘÁBKOVÁ, A. a kol.: Ročenka konkurenceschopnosti České republiky 2005. Praha, CES VŠEM 2005. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    50. Karkkainen, B., Fung, A., Sabel, C.F.: After Backyard Environmentalism: Toward a Performance-Based Regime of Environmental Regulation. American Behavioral Scientist. 1999, no. 4, p. 692-711.http://bostonreview.net/BR24.5/sabel.html. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    51. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., Mastruzzi, M.: Governance Matters III: Governance Indicators for 1996-2002. Washington, DC, World Bank 2003 (Policy Research Working Paper No. 3630). Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    52. Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., Mastruzzi, M.: Governance Matters IV: Governance Indicators for 1996-2004. Washington, DC, World Bank 2005 (Policy Research Working Paper No. 3630). Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    53. Keefer, P.: Democratization and Clientelism: Why Are Young Democracies Badly Governed? Washington, DC, World Bank 2005 (Policy Research Working Paper No. 3594). http://cniss.wustl.edu/workshoppapers/keeferdemocracies.pdf. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    54. Klapper, L.F., Love, I.: Corporate Governance, Investor Protection, and Performance in Emerging Markets. Washington, DC, World Bank 2002 (Working Paper No. 2818). http://wdsbeta.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/IW3P/IB/2002/05/03/000094946_02041804272577/Rendered/PDF/multi0page.pdf. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    55. Klapper, L., Laeven, L., Rajan, R.: Business Environment and Firm Entry: Evidence from International Data. Cambridge, MA, National Bureau of Economic Research 2004 (Working Paper No. 10380). http://www.nber.org/papers/w10380. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    56. Kočenda, E.: Macroeconomic Convergence in Transition Economies. Journal of Comparative Economics. 2001, no. 32, p. 1-23. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    57. Kočenda, E.: Pilgrims to the Eurozone: How Far, How Fast? Prague, CERGE-EI (Working Paper No. 279).
    58. Knack, S., Kiefer, P.: Institutions and Economic Performance: Gross-Country Tests Using Alternative Institutional Measures. Blackwell Publishing: Economics and Politics. 1995, no. 3, p. 207-227. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    59. Knell, M., Srholec, M.: Emerging Varieties of Capitalism in Central and Eastern Europe. Materiál z konference "Varieties of Capitalism in Post-communist Countries", University of Paisley, 23.-24. září 2005.
    60. Knill, C., Lehmkuhl, D.: Private Actors and the State: Internationalization and Changing Patterns of Governance. Governance. 2000, no. 1, p. 41-63. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    61. Kutan, A., Yigit, T.: Nominal and Real Stochastic Convergence of Transition Economies. Journal of Comparative Economics. 2004, no. 32, p. 23-36. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    62. La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.: The Duality of Government. Cambridge, MA, Harvard Institute of Economic Research 1998 (Working Paper No. 1847). post.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/shleifer/papers/qualgov.pdf. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    63. Loayza, N.V., Soto, R.: On the Measurement of Market-Oriented Reforms. Washington, DC, World Bank 2004 (Wor king Paper No. 3371). http://wdsbeta.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/IW3P/IB/2004/08/31/000009486_20040831084946/Rendered/PDF/wps3371MARKET.pdf.
    64. Moers, L.: Institutions, Economic Performance and Transition. Amsterdam, Tinbergen Institute 2002. http://www.lucmoers.org/thesisfinal.PDF.
    65. Nelson, R., Sampat, B.: Making Sense of Institutions as a Factor Shaping Economic Performance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 2001, no. 1, p. 31-54. http://www.wcfia.harvard.edu/conferences/sustaindev/papers/New%20Papers%20since%20Conference/Nelson.pdf. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    66. North, D.C.: Institution, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge, MA, Cambridge University Press 1990.
    67. OECD: OECD DAC. Paris, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 1995.
    68. OECD: Behind the Corporate Veil: Using Corporate Entities for Illicit Purpose. Paris, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development 2001.http://www1.oecd.org/publications/e-book/2101131e.pdf.
    69. Pelikán, P.: Competitions of Socio-Economic Institutions: In Search of the Winners. In: Gerken, L. (ed.): Competition Aminy Institutions. London, MacMillan Press and New York, St. Martin´s Press 1995, p. 22-43. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    70. Pelikán, P.: Choice, Chance and Necessity in the Evolution of Forms of Economies. In: Cantner, U., Metcalfe, J.S. (eds.): Change, Transformation and Development. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York and London, Springer-Verlag 2003, p. 31-52 (a). Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    71. Pelikán, P.: Bringing Institutions into Evolutionary Economics: Another View with Links to Changes in Physical and Social Technologies. Journal of Evolutionary Economics. 2003, no. 4, p. 237-258 (b). Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    72. Pelikán, P.: Why Economic Policy Need Comprehensive Evolutionary Analysis. In: Pelikán, P., Wegner, G. (eds.): Evolutionary Analysis of Economic Policy. Cheltenham, UK, North-Hampton, MA, Edward Eldgar 2003, p. 23-58 (c).
    73. Perotti, E., Volpin, P.: Lobbying on Entry. Tinbergen, Tinbergen Institute 2004 (Discussion Paper 088/2).http://www1.oecd.org/publications/e-book/2101131e.pdf. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    74. Prescott, E.C.: Why Do Americans Work so Much More Than Europeans? Cambridge, MA, NBER 2004 (Working Paper No. 10316). http://www.nber.org/papers/w10316. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    75. Řezník, J.: Ekonomická analýza konkurence států. Politická ekonomie. 1999, č. 5. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    76. Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., Trebbi, F.: Institutions Rule: The Primasy of Institutions over Integration and Geography in Economic Development. Washington, DC, IMF 2002 (Working Paper No. 189). www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2002/wp02189.pdf. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    77. Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., Trebbi, F.: Institutions Rule: The Primacy of Institutions Over Geography and Integration in Economic Development. Cambridge, MA, NBER 2005 (Working Paper No. 9305). http://www.nber.org/papers/w9305.
    78. Sabel, C.F., Reddy, S.: Learning to Learn: Cutting the Gordian Knot of Development Today. Columbia University 2002 (unpublished paper). http://www2.law.columbia.edu/sabel/papers/newdawn.doc.
    79. Sabel, C.F.: Beyond Principal-Agent Governance: Experimentalist Organizations, Learning and Accountability. Amsterdam, Amsterdam University Press 2004. http://www2.law.columbia.edu/sabel/papers/Sabel.definitief.doc.
    80. Saisana, M., Tarantola, S.: State-of-the-art Report on Current Methodologies and Practices for Composite Indicator Development. Ispra, Joint Research Centre - European Commission - Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen Technological and Economic Risk Management 2002 (EUR 20408). http://farmweb.jrc.cec.eu.int/ci/Document/state-of-the-art_EUR20408.pdf.
    81. Sapir, A.: Globalisation and the Reform of European Social Models. Bacground document for the presentation at ECOFIN Informal Meeting in Manchester, 9 September 2005.
    82. Tanzi, V. : Corruption Around the World. Washington, DC, IMF 1998 (Staff Paper No. 4). http://www.imf.org/external/Pubs/FT/staffp/1998/12-98/pdf/tanzi.pdf. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    83. Transparency International: Global Corruption Barometer. Berlin, Transparency International 2004. http://www.transparency.cz/pdf/global_corruption_barometer2004_report.pdf.
    84. Transparency International: TI Corruption Perception Index 2005. Berlin, Transparency International 2005.
    85. UNDP: Strategy Note on Governance for Human Development. United Nations Development Programme 2004.
    86. Vymětal, P.: Proměny Governance. Praha, CES VŠEM 2005 (pracovní sešit č. 10).
    87. Vymětal, P., Žák, M.: Instituce a výkonnost. Politická ekonomie. 2005, č. 4, s. 545-566. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    88. Vymětal, P., Žák, M.: Když bují korupce. Ekonom. 2005, č. 48, s. 60-62.
    89. Williamson, O.E.: The New Institutional Economics: Taking Stocks, Looking Ahead. Journal of Economic Literature. 2000, no. 3, p. 595-613. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    90. Wilshire Consulting: Permissible Equity Markets Investment Analysis. Santa Monica, CA, Wilshire Consulting 2005.
    91. World Bank: World Development Report 1997: The State in Changing World. Washington, DC, World Bank 1997. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    92. World Bank: Go ver nan ce Mat ters IV. Wa shing ton, DC, World Bank 2005. http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance/pubs/govmatters4.html.
    93. World Economic Forum: Global Competitiveness Report 2004-2005. Palgrave McMillan 2004.
    94. Žák, M.: Kvalita správy: hodnocení a měření. Praha, CES VŠEM 2005 (Working Paper No. 13) (a).
    95. Žák, M.: Politické riziko v tranzitivních ekonomikách a v EU. Politická ekonomie. 2005, č. 1, s. 7-25 (b). Přejít k původnímu zdroji...

    Tento článek je publikován v režimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (CC BY NC ND 4.0), která umožňuje nekomerční distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.


    Zpět na obsah